Jump to content

Football 18/19


ThomThomDrum
 Share

Recommended Posts

Weird game that one. Arsenal were abysmal yet should have scored 5. Despite that, probably a fair result. Bellerin is a tragic defender.

Not sure what their attempt at playing out from the back is, either. Cech passes it to one CB, who has no options so passes it back to Cech, who passes it to the other CB, who has no options so passes it back to Cech, who after a few repetitions boots it upfield. Even worse doing it when 3-2 down with 60 seconds to play.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Gucci Piggy said:

Weird game that one. Arsenal were abysmal yet should have scored 5. Despite that, probably a fair result. Bellerin is a tragic defender.

yeah, missed two of the easiest chances they'll get all season.

Despite being pointless they were always going to be tough games to get points in, and at least yesterday showed a bit of hope going forwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Gucci Piggy said:

Weird game that one. Arsenal were abysmal yet should have scored 5. Despite that, probably a fair result. Bellerin is a tragic defender.

Not sure what their attempt at playing out from the back is, either. Cech passes it to one CB, who has no options so passes it back to Cech, who passes it to the other CB, who has no options so passes it back to Cech, who after a few repetitions boots it upfield. Even worse doing it when 3-2 down with 60 seconds to play.

Arsenal were not 'abysmal'. We defended poorly but looked dangerous going forward. I think it was promising performance. Created loads of chances and our final ball was good. It was just the finishing that let us down when attacking.

Playing out from the back is new to the players and it is something that will be developed over the season. People were saying the exact same as you about City during Pep's first season. It always baffles me how quick people are to criticise the implementation of new systems. Have some patience for gods sake and realise these learning these things aren't instant.

Edited by CRW5252
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRW5252 said:

Arsenal were not 'abysmal'. We defended poorly but looked dangerous going forward. I think it was promising performance. 

It always baffles me how quick people are to criticise the implementation of new systems. 

Sounds like the old system to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shocking from Utd. Fans wont accept that. A nothing performance. 3-1 down at half time and came out for the 2nd half like a limp dick. Brighton were very comfortable for most of the game. 

Rather unsurprisingly Utd scored when there were men in the box. Who wouldve thought that you can score more when you attack in numbers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, CRW5252 said:

Arsenal were not 'abysmal'. We defended poorly but looked dangerous going forward. I think it was promising performance. Created loads of chances and our final ball was good. It was just the finishing that let us down when attacking.

Playing out from the back is new to the players and it is something that will be developed over the season. People were saying the exact same as you about City during Pep's first season. It always baffles me how quick people are to criticise the implementation of new systems. Have some patience for gods sake and realise these learning these things aren't instant.

For a lot of the game they were abysmal. First half of the first half they couldn't string two passes together, couldn't get near Chelsea when they had the ball and the defence was being carved apart with ease. I've rarely seen any team look so bad, nevermind one with the quality Arsenal have in their ranks. For the rest of the first half Arsenal were decent, but the chances came from Chelsea having moments in defence where they were just as bad as Arsenal had been. Constant failures to track runners and mark people in the box (the reason I concentrated on Arsenal's failures is because Arsenal are the team I follow in the Premier League and I don't really care about Chelsea). Final ball was decent, yeah.

Second half the whole team offered practically nothing. It was all Chelsea.

I'm aware playing out from the back is new to the players and will take time to perfect, but it shouldn't be beyond players who start for Arsenal to have the awareness that a CB needs to have actual options to pass to if they want to play out from the back. Every time Chelsea's CBs have the ball, Jorginho is there showing for it. Half the time when Mustafi or Sokratis have the ball, there are no other Arsenal players to be seen.

For me, the only Arsenal players to come out of that game with any glory were Monreal, Guendouzi and Iwobi. Mkhi did some damage in the offensive third but the amount of time he was either invisible or giving the ball away negated that, for me.

There were positives there, and thankfully they now have a great run during which they can hopefully find form and put everything together. I expected 0 points from the first two games, so I can't say I'm too disappointed right now. Rather be in that position than United's who've already dropped points they're expected to get in the bag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, The Nal said:

Shocking from Utd. Fans wont accept that. A nothing performance. 3-1 down at half time and came out for the 2nd half like a limp dick. Brighton were very comfortable for most of the game. 

Rather unsurprisingly Utd scored when there were men in the box. Who wouldve thought that you can score more when you attack in numbers?

Many of us have found it unacceptable for 2 years. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, The Nal said:

Shocking from Utd. Fans wont accept that.

seen an awful lot of Mu fans screaming for Jose to be sacked. :lol: 

Meanwhile Pogba misplaced 27 passes, while DdG has let in 10 of the last 14 shots he's faced.

If DdG has gone to shit then Utd are fucked. He's been the difference between points and no points for so many games in the last few seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, eFestivals said:

seen an awful lot of Mu fans screaming for Jose to be sacked. :lol: 

Meanwhile Pogba misplaced 27 passes, while DdG has let in 10 of the last 14 shots he's faced.

If DdG has gone to shit then Utd are fucked. He's been the difference between points and no points for so many games in the last few seasons.

Ddg  seems to be having a world cup hangover....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Retro P said:

It’s crazy, I’m sure it would cost at least 30m to sack him so just don’t see it happening anytime soon. Hopefully not anyway as it’s getting a bit hilarious/sad to watch. 

Yup but thats chump change compared to losing pogba or not getting in the champs league next year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, eFestivals said:

seen an awful lot of Mu fans screaming for Jose to be sacked. :lol: 

Yup. The fans won't take another season of that style of footie. Fans wont take another few weeks of it. 

9 hours ago, thetime said:

Many of us have found it unacceptable for 2 years. 

Yeah but you have to give a manager a bit of time. Some City fans were calling for Guardiola to go after a few months. 

3rd season now though and just shit. Some of those players are absolute turkeys. 

The lack of urgency and fight was, weird. One yellow card while losing 3-1 losing away from home says it all. And it was for a clumsy trip. 

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Latest Activity

    • my wife and I put two Oxfam volunteering spots in the pot today as we managed to secure tickets in the resale on Sunday, fingers crossed they show up for you soon!
    • We’re after 1 Oxfam spot for my wife, having secured one myself back in Feb.   We’ve been weighing up whether to stick or twist with the cutoff coming up.    Your words sound encouraging though so we might have to stick it out and hammer the Oxfam site for that 1 spot! 
    • This gives us hope! We're lucky enough to work on our laptops all day so this is all possible!
    • So long as you requested your bus via the transport survey before April 15th, you're all good - there haven't been any confirmation emails yet 
    • Did some digging online. Well, you did ask.   There isn't much there that's very recent. An application for planning permission for "use of land for siting of up to 16 low impact residential shelters within a woodland garden setting and associated operational development comprising car park, telephone box, and children's play structure" was rejected in 1999 - though apparently there was a "legal breakthrough" in 2001. This is from 1995:   Clearly it's still in use. A resident called Theo Simon stood for election to the local council (for the Green Party) in 2017. His band, Seize the Day, seems to play Glastonbury every year (at Toad Hall, Small World, sometimes other sets elsewhere). This is a video of their 2019 set:     There's an interview with him, probably filmed at Kings Hill, here. He sounds pretty cool if you ask me.   https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/why-religion-matters/0/steps/73899   This is from a university thesis submitted in 1999:   The King’s Hill Collective The King’s Hill Collective can be seen as solution to increasing pressures of living on the road for Travellers who were bringing up children and as a solution to (and rejection of) mainstream consumerist society by non Travellers many of whom were originally city dwellers. Nevertheless because many of the members had direct travelling experience, this community provided an example of one extreme in a continuum between those Travellers for whom the tag ‘New Age’ is a complete irrelevance and those for whom it is at least understandable if not desirable. This group is on the ‘New Age’, ecologically aware, ideologically ‘hippie’ and ‘sorted’ end of the New Age Traveller continuum discussed in the previous chapter. The site, which overlooks Pilton farm (the site of the Glastonbury Festival), is slowly maturing now with numerous trees, vegetables and a fully functioning water bore hole which supplies the site with drinking water. Water is extracted on a weekly basis using an old petrol engine and pump. The water, which is filtered by a series of sand traps, is inspected on an annual basis. The collective is concerned to demonstrate its willingness to 243adhere to regulations were this is possible and not contrary to its collective ideology. There are 16 plots, each at some stage of the development of the site, having a bender.   The benders are almost exclusively constructed of light green Tarpaulin over a hazel wood matrix. Stainless steel flexi-vents lead from stoves in the benders. These act as chimneys supported by a single branch driven into the earth. The stoves are usually home-made conversions of gas cylinders which have been cut and welded into shape although there was an solid fuel Rayburn installed in one bender during the study period. Inside the benders bedding is arranged on wooden pallets or platforms and there is often an additional gas stove for cooking. Water is supplied either directly from the holding tank or stored in water barrels. Lighting is almost exclusively by candles or ‘hurricane lamps’. Twelve volt batteries and in one case a wind generator supplies electricity for radios and in one case a small black and white television. Some of the more established benders had a variety of trees and shrubs around the canvass construction including apple, pear and fig trees as well as a variety of fruits.   The collective is serviced by a pay telephone located in an old red telephone box. Its position, in the middle of a field, is as incongruous as the lamp post in C.S. Lewis’s Narnia books and is in a way reminiscent of the TARDIS of Doctor Who, adding to the slightly surreal or magical atmosphere of the place. Inside a small domestic pay phone is installed and managed by one of the community.   At the centre of the site is a clearing of grass that acts as a communal area surrounded by a small circular mound inside of which runs a circular ditch in the fashion of a place of worship. In the centre of the circle is a small collection of sea stones collected from a nearby shoreline. There are four gaps in the mound representing the solstices and equinoxes, which correspond to the cardinal points of the compass. Each section of the mound was constructed during the period of the year that it represents. There are symbols representing Beltane and other significant calendar dates placed appropriately on the circle. The King’s Hill site owes its existence to Chris Black, a man who was broadly sympathetic to alternative lifestyles and provided initial financial support to the project. Chris Black purchased the field and ‘loaned’ sixteen plots to a number of Travellers and bender dwellers. The newly formed community developed a ‘constitution’ and organised a system whereby the loan of the plots was paid back over a period of two years through weekly contributions to a central fund. Thus after two years the land belonged to sixteen stakeholders.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...