Jump to content

Brexit Schmexit


LJS
 Share

Recommended Posts

58 minutes ago, theevilfridge said:

Pretty sure it's too late to make concessions at that point, genius.

It also brings about questions that will cause huge problems for future voting agreements. As the lack of trust gained from the tories not acknowledging the pair with Jo swinson. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, kaosmark2 said:

It also brings about questions that will cause huge problems for future voting agreements. As the lack of trust gained from the tories not acknowledging the pair with Jo swinson. 

I think people forget that labour MPs vote on things other than Brexit and need support of Tory mps to get anything through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

I think people forget that labour MPs vote on things other than Brexit and need support of Tory mps to get anything through.

Quite.

I think failing to acknowledge and hold up the bargain will hurt Brandon Lewis and others involved in Swinson's pairing in future votes for a long time. I don't really want Labour MPs acting similarly and then failing to get a different bill through because of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kaosmark2 said:

Quite.

I think failing to acknowledge and hold up the bargain will hurt Brandon Lewis and others involved in Swinson's pairing in future votes for a long time. I don't really want Labour MPs acting similarly and then failing to get a different bill through because of it.

Are you saying Mann, Field, Hoey and Stringer were part of an actual voting agreement last night, like Lewis was? As they weren't paired, I'm not sure what point you're trying to make? Unless they literally took the Tory whip?

Edited by theevilfridge
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, theevilfridge said:

Are you saying Mann, Field, Hoey and Stringer were part of an actual voting agreement last night, like Lewis was? As they weren't paired, I'm not sure what point you're trying to make? Unless they literally took the Tory whip?

They defintely have links with Tory Brexit MPs, just like Tory remain MPs have links with some labour MPs and labour/Tory mps will have links about individual issues. They certainly weren’t taking the Tory whip, they were voting in line with their individual (and long standing) personal beliefs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kaosmark2 said:

Quite.

I think failing to acknowledge and hold up the bargain will hurt Brandon Lewis and others involved in Swinson's pairing in future votes for a long time. I don't really want Labour MPs acting similarly and then failing to get a different bill through because of it.

I would have slightly more respect if the torys were honest about the pairing issue, rather than say they forgot. It’s 2018 and technology should be used to allow MPs to vote when they have a good reason not to attend.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

I would have slightly more respect if the torys were honest about the pairing issue, rather than say they forgot. It’s 2018 and technology should be used to allow MPs to vote when they have a good reason not to attend.

you would respect them more if they were honest and said 'we lied to and took advantage of a woman on maternity leave to pass close legislation'???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

They defintely have links with Tory Brexit MPs, just like Tory remain MPs have links with some labour MPs and labour/Tory mps will have links about individual issues. They certainly weren’t taking the Tory whip, they were voting in line with their individual (and long standing) personal beliefs.

If being buddies with Brexit Tories and their longstanding beliefs on a single issue are more important to them than a Labour government then they are welcome to leave/be kicked out of the party and run on that ticket at the next election. See how far it gets them.

PS. I'm off to a festival tomorrow without my phone so I guess you'll have the last word. Don't think either of us are gonna convince each other anyway. Might just bookmark the point in the thread so that when we end up with No Deal you can be reminded of your views at one of the chances there were to stop it.

Edited by theevilfridge
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, zahidf said:

you would respect them more if they were honest and said 'we lied to and took advantage of a woman on maternity leave to pass close legislation'???

If they are honest they are scumbags, , instead they were lieing scumbags! As I have said rules should change to stop it happening, but no political advantage to the torys in helping youngish woman mps vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, theevilfridge said:

Are you saying Mann, Field, Hoey and Stringer were part of an actual voting agreement last night, like Lewis was? As they weren't paired, I'm not sure what point you're trying to make? Unless they literally took the Tory whip?

No, I'm saying that in their debates in parliament and discussions with other MPs they took a stance and said they were going to stand by it. If they're viewed as untrustworthy " in the perfect position to lie to the Tories and screw them over, weren't they?" as you described it, then they'll find it harder in future to get other concessions/agreements through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, theevilfridge said:

If being buddies with Brexit Tories and their longstanding beliefs on a single issue are more important to them than a Labour government then they are welcome to leave/be kicked out of the party and run on that ticket at the next election. See how far it gets them.

PS. I'm off to a festival tomorrow without my phone so I guess you'll have the last word. Don't think either of us are gonna convince each other anyway. Might just bookmark the point in the thread so that when we end up with No Deal you can be reminded of your views at one of the chances there were to stop it.

They are also buddies with labour mps on other issues. Being a labour mps is not just a view on Brexit. Did they block increases in minimum wage, surestart, increased funding in education/health? They believe Brexit is best for the country just like many labour voters do.

There are certainly other times labour could have stopped Brexit. One example was picking a leader to succeed Ed Milliband. Many moaning about Hoey et Al decided to pick a labour mp with a track record of supporting Brexit as leader, who then didnt bother to try during the referendum campaign. Others (like me) felt a remain politician would be a more sensible choice. Others may look at how labour for years treated their working class support as an embarrassment. It would be simplistic to put the blame on anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was here or the "annoyed" thread.

Work requirements require me to share a car with fellow workers for a couple of hours each way every working day. A trapped audience.

One fellow worker the other day mentioned how they were so pissed of with hearing about Brexit all of the time.

They were so pissed off with hearing about Brexit all of the time that nobody could get a word in edgeways for half an hour whilst they carried on about pissed off they were about hearing about Brexit all of the time.

Serious levels of irony right?

I've been tempted to start a "Things that amuse you" thread for a while now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pink_triangle said:

Why does her opinion matter more than anyone else? What if she says the next general election result shouldn’t be accepted as she perceives it will make the country poorer.

That's the Tory Mps option isn't it? Doesn't really work cos you can vote out a govt. We ain't got the opportunity to reverse Brexit

 

Also, not sure us affording is an opinion....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, zahidf said:

An actual Tory MEP writes

 

The first isn't really a biggie, it's a fairly standard view ... tho what he probably means via treason is that they get the "death sentence" (and hasn't realised it was finally abolished for treason 15-ish years ago).

The second is laughable, because it could just as easily be turned round on the brexiters, who are undermining the UK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...