Jump to content

Brexit Schmexit


LJS
 Share

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

Have you been paying attention? If Labour won an election it would still be a shambles of a govt. In fact it would probably be even more divided over brexit than the tories.

So while I don't approve of it, Jez abdicating his responsibilities is probably his (personal) most effective way forwards, even tho it fucks the country.

There is also no guarantee that labour would win an election when torys stood on a platform that labour were trying to block Brexit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

I think you will find the Tory whip threatens a lot and doesnt always follow through, especially without a majority. I’m sure May would have carried on and will continue to carry on. The fact is being PM during Brexit is not a job I think anyone is desperate to take over, while a lame duck can do the work and carry the flack.

In a similar position there is no way Corbyn would have followed the labour whip to vote against a Middle East policy he strongly objected. If you accept that MPS will on occasions be independent, you have to accept that the independent view are sometimes different to your own. However they believe in these things, just as strongly as you have when you disagreed with the labour government in the past.

I really don’t think she would this time. Too many gunning for her from all directions. Whether there would be a Labour government after the dust settled, I don’t know, but it was worth a shot.

On the second paragraph, if Corbyn had acted the same in similar circumstances then he should have the whip withdrawn too. If they have priorities other than getting a Labour government then they’ll be happy to sit as an independent MP espousing those views rather than as a Labour MP.

I note Vauxhall Labour are moving to censure Hoey, I wonder if the others will follow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eFestivals said:

Have you been paying attention? If Labour won an election it would still be a shambles of a govt. In fact it would probably be even more divided over brexit than the tories.

So while I don't approve of it, Jez abdicating his responsibilities is probably his (personal) most effective way forwards, even tho it fucks the country.

The views of the PLP, members and Labour voters being what they are (especially with Momentum taking a firmer anti-Brexit stance recently), there’s no way EEA/EFTA and/or a second referendum wouldn’t happen. That’s enough for them to be less of a shambles than the Tories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

There is also no guarantee that labour would win an election when torys stood on a platform that labour were trying to block Brexit.

There’s never a guarantee, but the opposition should always want the opportunity to govern. Look at last year when everyone said Labour made a terrible mistake agreeing with the election.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, theevilfridge said:

The views of the PLP, members and Labour voters being what they are (especially with Momentum taking a firmer anti-Brexit stance recently), there’s no way EEA/EFTA and/or a second referendum wouldn’t happen.

I don't have your certainty. Jez is a life-long hard brexiter, remember? He's been voting alongside Cash, Bone, Redwood and the rest for decades.

And he was exceedingly quick at getting his decades-long preferred policy adopted by Labour. Him giving it up is as likely as him giving up no-nukes as party policy if he ever succeeds in getting it adopted as party policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, theevilfridge said:

everyone said Labour made a terrible mistake agreeing with the election.

not me.

Any party that's scared of a democratic vote isn't a party that people will want in power.

That's the reason why all the democrats in the HoC backed a vote on the EU in the first place.

(PS: just in case you come back with it, a second vote about the same thing is something a bit different to the general rule, and particularly when there's been no clear change of mind by the electorate).

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

I don't have your certainty. Jez is a life-long hard brexiter, remember? He's been voting alongside Cash, Bone, Redwood and the rest for decades.

And he was exceedingly quick at getting his decades-long preferred policy adopted by Labour. Him giving it up is as likely as him giving up no-nukes as party policy if he ever succeeds in getting it adopted as party policy.

He wouldn’t have the numbers for it in Parliament, and he’d be going against his own fanclub. Wouldn’t matter what his personal views were. He’d be removed before being allowed to go for hard Brexit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

not me.

Any party that's scared of a democratic vote isn't a party that people will want in power.

That's the reason why all the democrats in the HoC backed a vote on the EU in the first place.

(PS: just in case you come back with it, a second vote about the same thing is something a bit different to the general rule, and particularly when there's been no clear change of mind by the electorate).

Cool, you agree pink_triangle was talking bollocks then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, theevilfridge said:

The views of the PLP, members and Labour voters being what they are (especially with Momentum taking a firmer anti-Brexit stance recently), there’s no way EEA/EFTA and/or a second referendum wouldn’t happen. That’s enough for them to be less of a shambles than the Tories.

There is a huge difference in opinion on Brexit with labour members and labour voters!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, theevilfridge said:

He wouldn’t have the numbers for it in Parliament, and he’d be going against his own fanclub. Wouldn’t matter what his personal views were. He’d be removed before being allowed to go for hard Brexit.

I don't think his fans are aware of his Brexit views, they are pretty much signed up to support regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

There is a huge difference in opinion on Brexit with labour members and labour voters!

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-poll-voters-eu-leave-wrong-theresa-may-negotiations-deal-yougov-a8383826.html

”73% of Labour voters said it was a mistake to leave the EU”. From last month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, theevilfridge said:

He wouldn’t have the numbers for it in Parliament

there's not the numbers for any option in Parliament, so it doesn't make a difference which he chooses.

He doesn't have the numbers for no-nukes, but that hasn't stopped him from keeping on pushing. He's not going to drop an adopted policy that matches his life-long wants.

 

Quote

 and he’d be going against his own fanclub.

I refer you to present policy, where he's going against his own fanclub. :P

 

Quote

Wouldn’t matter what his personal views were. He’d be removed before being allowed to go for hard Brexit.

you mean like the sensible tried to do after he demanded an immediate hard brexit the day after the vote?

It didn't work then, so I don't see why it would work now. Exactly as you called them, he has a fanclub - and not intelligence-led support.

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, theevilfridge said:

that's merely about the same number of Labour voters who voted against Brexit in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, theevilfridge said:

Labour are not in the position where they can discount the views of 27% of their voters. They lost Mansfield, Stoke and Walsall to the tories last time. Ignoring the views of leave voters could cost them more working class seats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zahidf said:

To me deselection would be a mistake. This was not a vote of no confidence against the government as people have tried to make out.  I think it is important that labour continues to be a broad church representing the diverse views of labour voters.  I dont want them to become a party like the SNP where everyone agrees about everything.

The current labour leader constantly rebelled as a backbencher and I his past record suggests it is very likely he would have voted with Hoey, Stringer etc if he was still sitting on the backbenches. I think its hypocritical for Corbynites now to suggest rebellion is the most terrible thing there is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pink_triangle said:

To me deselection would be a mistake. This was not a vote of no confidence against the government as people have tried to make out.  I think it is important that labour continues to be a broad church representing the diverse views of labour voters.  I dont want them to become a party like the SNP where everyone agrees about everything.

The current labour leader constantly rebelled as a backbencher and I his past record suggests it is very likely he would have voted with Hoey, Stringer etc if he was still sitting on the backbenches. I think its hypocritical for Corbynites now to suggest rebellion is the most terrible thing there is.

Id say campaigning and palling around with Boris and Farage isnt really a Labour MPs job

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pink_triangle said:

So the 25 percent of labour voters who want to leave should have no representation within the party? The idea that everyone should think the same is baffling to me.

Her ward is more like 10% leavers. what about the other 90%?

 

Anyway, should the 48% who voted remain not be represented then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, zahidf said:

Her ward is more like 10% leavers. what about the other 90%?

 

Anyway, should the 48% who voted remain not be represented then?

The 48% who voted remain are represented. By the LibDems, SNP, Greens, etc. NOT by Labour.

But anyway, PT was very obviously referring to the difference there can be between a party line (which would represent the remainers, if Labour represented the remainers) and a personal line, where there will also be some dissenters on just about any issue. Jez is the living personification of this!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

The 48% who voted remain are represented. By the LibDems, SNP, Greens, etc. NOT by Labour.

But anyway, PT was very obviously referring to the difference there can be between a party line (which would represent the remainers, if Labour represented the remainers) and a personal line, where there will also be some dissenters on just about any issue. Jez is the living personification of this!

They're not represented by the Lib Dems based on Cable and Farron not bothering to turn up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Latest Activity

    • So long as you requested your bus via the transport survey before April 15th, you're all good - there haven't been any confirmation emails yet 
    • Did some digging online. Well, you did ask.   There isn't much there that's very recent. An application for planning permission for "use of land for siting of up to 16 low impact residential shelters within a woodland garden setting and associated operational development comprising car park, telephone box, and children's play structure" was rejected in 1999 - though apparently there was a "legal breakthrough" in 2001. This is from 1995:   Clearly it's still in use. A resident called Theo Simon stood for election to the local council (for the Green Party) in 2017. His band, Seize the Day, seems to play Glastonbury every year (at Toad Hall, Small World, sometimes other sets elsewhere). This is a video of their 2019 set:     There's an interview with him, probably filmed at Kings Hill, here. He sounds pretty cool if you ask me.   https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/why-religion-matters/0/steps/73899   This is from a university thesis submitted in 1999:   The King’s Hill Collective The King’s Hill Collective can be seen as solution to increasing pressures of living on the road for Travellers who were bringing up children and as a solution to (and rejection of) mainstream consumerist society by non Travellers many of whom were originally city dwellers. Nevertheless because many of the members had direct travelling experience, this community provided an example of one extreme in a continuum between those Travellers for whom the tag ‘New Age’ is a complete irrelevance and those for whom it is at least understandable if not desirable. This group is on the ‘New Age’, ecologically aware, ideologically ‘hippie’ and ‘sorted’ end of the New Age Traveller continuum discussed in the previous chapter. The site, which overlooks Pilton farm (the site of the Glastonbury Festival), is slowly maturing now with numerous trees, vegetables and a fully functioning water bore hole which supplies the site with drinking water. Water is extracted on a weekly basis using an old petrol engine and pump. The water, which is filtered by a series of sand traps, is inspected on an annual basis. The collective is concerned to demonstrate its willingness to 243adhere to regulations were this is possible and not contrary to its collective ideology. There are 16 plots, each at some stage of the development of the site, having a bender.   The benders are almost exclusively constructed of light green Tarpaulin over a hazel wood matrix. Stainless steel flexi-vents lead from stoves in the benders. These act as chimneys supported by a single branch driven into the earth. The stoves are usually home-made conversions of gas cylinders which have been cut and welded into shape although there was an solid fuel Rayburn installed in one bender during the study period. Inside the benders bedding is arranged on wooden pallets or platforms and there is often an additional gas stove for cooking. Water is supplied either directly from the holding tank or stored in water barrels. Lighting is almost exclusively by candles or ‘hurricane lamps’. Twelve volt batteries and in one case a wind generator supplies electricity for radios and in one case a small black and white television. Some of the more established benders had a variety of trees and shrubs around the canvass construction including apple, pear and fig trees as well as a variety of fruits.   The collective is serviced by a pay telephone located in an old red telephone box. Its position, in the middle of a field, is as incongruous as the lamp post in C.S. Lewis’s Narnia books and is in a way reminiscent of the TARDIS of Doctor Who, adding to the slightly surreal or magical atmosphere of the place. Inside a small domestic pay phone is installed and managed by one of the community.   At the centre of the site is a clearing of grass that acts as a communal area surrounded by a small circular mound inside of which runs a circular ditch in the fashion of a place of worship. In the centre of the circle is a small collection of sea stones collected from a nearby shoreline. There are four gaps in the mound representing the solstices and equinoxes, which correspond to the cardinal points of the compass. Each section of the mound was constructed during the period of the year that it represents. There are symbols representing Beltane and other significant calendar dates placed appropriately on the circle. The King’s Hill site owes its existence to Chris Black, a man who was broadly sympathetic to alternative lifestyles and provided initial financial support to the project. Chris Black purchased the field and ‘loaned’ sixteen plots to a number of Travellers and bender dwellers. The newly formed community developed a ‘constitution’ and organised a system whereby the loan of the plots was paid back over a period of two years through weekly contributions to a central fund. Thus after two years the land belonged to sixteen stakeholders.
    • K.O.G. were one of my favourite acts at EOTR a couple of years ago. Just a joyful afrobeat danceathon
    • Can tell you about a 1.5k ticket if you're interested lad? Not more at face value I don't think, sorry! Although if I hear owt else back I'll drop you a message 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...