Jump to content

jyoung

Member
  • Posts

    3,967
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by jyoung

  1. 1 hour ago, Hugh Jass said:

    She's done it again!

    Quite remarkable to put out a trio as good as NFR, Chemtrails and this in a two year period.

    Agreed. NFR obviously stands out as a masterpiece but both this and Chemtrails are hugely impressive in their own right. If You Lie Down With Me is vintage Lana.

  2. 2 hours ago, thetime said:

    Whilst you can argue united to change the manager, conte is certainly not the answer. His record at champions league level is as woeful as ole's.

    As if United have set it alight the last ten years. Turning your nose up at a world class coach is hilarious. Ole in!

  3. On 10/11/2021 at 9:43 PM, WS_Jack_III said:

    Benitez won't quit on Everton, he's a man of principle

    😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂

    "Chelsea is a big club with fantastic players, every manager wants to coach a such a big team, but I would never take that job, in respect for my former team at Liverpool, no matter what. For me there is only one club in England, and that's Liverpool."

    "Everton put eight or nine men behind the ball and defended deep but that's what small clubs do. When a team comes to Anfield and only want a point what else can you call them but a small club?"

  4. 17 hours ago, eastynh said:

    City beat Chelsea last season.

    Just not on Portuguese soil 😉

    Couldn't resist that one. Anyway I too think not having a striker WILL at some point catch up with City. I expect them to challenge in all comps but I think there will be moments when a number nine is needed.

  5. 6 hours ago, eFestivals said:

    Title decider going Liverpool way 

    Eh?

    6 hours ago, lost said:

    Anthony Taylor really hates chelsea!

    He fucking does mate honestly. I was at Anfield in the away end and Jesus Christ we all knew before a ball had been kicked that the useless twat would strike again.

  6. 1 minute ago, Hugh Jass said:

    I'm braced for the inevitable disappointment in February when Bayern announce they've already agreed the transfer.

    Idk mate. I just read that one of the reasons Chelsea went for Lukaku instead of Haaland is because they didn't want to pay a 21 year old more than double the wages of any other player in their squad. Considering that many players in the squad have won titles etc, I'd say that is probably fair. Idk what Bayern's wage bill is like but yeah.

  7. Just now, Hugh Jass said:

    For that money I’d be wanting a long term solution (same with Lukaku). You’ll get 2-3 years of Kane at his absolute peak, compared to a decade of Haaland.

    Agreed but football doesn't really work in long term solutions all too often anymore does it. Whoever gets Haaland next year for 60m or whatever it is will be laughing. The wages will be through the roof though.

  8. 10 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

    Still don't get why City are pursuing a 28 year old Kane when Mbappe and Haaland are on the market for similar amounts...

    Yeah it's an interesting one. Mbappe definitely wants to go to Madrid so maybe that's why? You'd think they could get Haaland though. All I can think is Kane is homegrown but that's no a big enough reason at all.

×
×
  • Create New...