Jump to content

Gorillaz


gmb1992
 Share

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, prestonmike said:

i still regret my decision to stay for the whole Gorrilaz set rather than escaping early to see Flaming Lips

If it makes you feel any better I watched Echo & The Bunnymen over Blur the year before 2010. Still my biggest ever Glasto regret. 

Edited by BlackHole2006
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not my thing so didn't go. Filled a last minute booking so can't complain.

In the days of YouTube and Spotify I can never understand why people go to see an act and then are shocked to discover it's not for them. 

Either way. If play prob a westholts headline but unlikely 

 

Edited by danbailey80
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BlackHole2006 said:

If it makes you feel any better I watched Echo & The Bunnymen over Blur the year before 2010. Still my biggest ever Glasto regret. 

Well if it makes you feel any better I was at black eyed peas at that point. Not even my biggest Glastonbury regret...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Tables innit said:

Was convinced by the missus (a massive Damon fan) to watch Gorillaz.  

Was gutted I had missed Flaming Lips.

Still not forgiven her.

My fella was a Gorillaz fan so missed out of Flaming Lips but tbh I didn't know them that well at the time so let it go

other killers (but enjoyed who I watched)

Chic over Portishead, Loved chic but never seen Portishead before

Muse over Sigur Ros,thankfully seeing them in September 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, verrymerry said:

Flaming Lips!!!  I nearly* cried when I watched their set on iPlayer at home

 

 

*Ok I did, but I was probably exhausted!

it's ok I cry after every festival......... and sad movies but only when I am on my own

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My decision to leave and head round to the Flaming Lips was a good one. 

Gorillaz would probably work for Damon fanboys in a smaller setting I suppose. But its not a stadium show. The atmosphere was as flat as I can remember. Damon making the journey further into his own hole. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, The Nal said:

My decision to leave and head round to the Flaming Lips was a good one. 

Gorillaz would probably work for Damon fanboys in a smaller setting I suppose. But its not a stadium show. The atmosphere was as flat as I can remember. Damon making the journey further into his own hole. 

Dreamland is definitely not a stadium, it's a few tired old rides on a gravel car park. Think of the travelling fair from Father Ted, but without the Spider Baby

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for some customary balance from all the whining...

All the sods that missed Blur the previous year got their chance to have a go didnt they?? Something they relish to this day. :D

So 1000's left after a couple tunes grumbling "This is shite!" to themselves. :thumbsu: Arsed.

Damon did feel imperious as a result of the triumph of '09 and thus o'ereached considerably at times on the night. It could never compare to the previous year and I think this is the basis of most of the ire on here and elsewhere about this show. But on its own merits (bar the whale song SNAFU) the gig was as unique a show as we've seen at the festival.

Those that were there for this know how it kicked off. I was miles back but people around me went seven shades of apeshit. As high a peak as any I can remember from the 20 or so Pyramid headliners ive seen.

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, The Nal said:

My decision to leave and head round to the Flaming Lips was a good one. 

Gorillaz would probably work for Damon fanboys in a smaller setting I suppose. But its not a stadium show. The atmosphere was as flat as I can remember. Damon making the journey further into his own hole. 

I like Flaming Lips.

But Wayne Coyne can't half talk some shite too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got to weigh in here with Wooderson, I wasn't there for the start, we wandered round a way in, but it was great. Problem is, everyone moans and says there's nothing unique at festivals, that it's just bands touring, Gorillaz put on this, a phenomenal lineup of guests etc. Mark E Smith, Lou fucking Reed! Bobby Womack, Shaun Ryder, Snoop etc and everyone moans cos it's not hits hits hits. I say more of this sort of thing.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mardy said:

I've got to weigh in here with Wooderson, I wasn't there for the start, we wandered round a way in, but it was great. Problem is, everyone moans and says there's nothing unique at festivals, that it's just bands touring, Gorillaz put on this, a phenomenal lineup of guests etc. Mark E Smith, Lou fucking Reed! Bobby Womack, Shaun Ryder, Snoop etc and everyone moans cos it's not hits hits hits. I say more of this sort of thing.

Half the fucking Clash played that show.

But we all want fucking Who back again Mardy don't we?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mardy said:

I've got to weigh in here with Wooderson, I wasn't there for the start, we wandered round a way in, but it was great. Problem is, everyone moans and says there's nothing unique at festivals, that it's just bands touring, Gorillaz put on this, a phenomenal lineup of guests etc. Mark E Smith, Lou fucking Reed! Bobby Womack, Shaun Ryder, Snoop etc and everyone moans cos it's not hits hits hits. I say more of this sort of thing.

Agree. Much rather a show like this where people experiment with new things and there's genuine highs than a safe bland set like The Who or Kanye served up. 

 

Also want to echo @Wooderson... it went CRAZY for that encore. The pop was huge. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, strummer77 said:

Agree. Much rather a show like this where people experiment with new things and there's genuine highs than a safe bland set like The Who or Kanye served up. 

 

Also want to echo @Wooderson... it went CRAZY for that encore. The pop was huge. 

I'd say Kanye did the opposite of a safe set; it was really polarising. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, aidenlangan95 said:

I'd say Kanye did the opposite of a safe set; it was really polarising. 

True. Thousands of people left that one aswell. Seems to happen every 4-5 years at the festival. One before that was Oasis in 2004. 

Gorillaz should've been on the West Holts I suppose. Perfect for that. Thousands of people streaming out of the Pyramid Field is not a successful headliner, despite so many people enjoying it

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that it would have worked a lot better in a smaller field, where you're less likely to have people leave because Gorilaz played Gorillaz songs in the style of Gorillaz rather than asking everyone if they're alright every five minutes.

Yeah, the Pirate Jet thing was rubbish and apparently Womack missed a cue before ultimately delivering a blistering vocal, but other than that the music was spot on - if you like Gorillaz.  I'm always going to be baffled how so many people can turn up to a Gorillaz gig and be disappointed with Gorillaz music?  I've watched it back a few times, and the music was played well, with some nice improvements, like the brass in Broken and guitar in Stylo.

Actually, funny the Oasis gig has come up - I thought it was fine. They might have looked miserable, but the music was alright.  They had stripped back some of the changes to the arrangements that had crept in over the years and were playing the songs like the records, E.g. doing the drums in Supersonic properly.

A good atmosphere will always elevate a performance for me, but I don't think I'm ever going to flounce off from seeing a band playing songs I know and like without fucking it up, even if they do look as miserable as sin and make the cardinal sin of getting on with the tunes rather than acting like a Butlins redcoat.

After all, it's the music that's most important isn't it?  Isn't it?

But as a counterpoint, I'm not massive familiar with New Order and the stinky atmosphere on stage ruined their 2005 gig for me.  I've no idea how well they played the songs.  So to bring it back to the start, I suppose the greater the familiarity of the crowd with the material, the more the music aspect matters relative to the showmanship.  I really love Gorillaz recorded output, particularly the 2nd and 3rd records, so I was never going to be put off by an aloof presentation.

 

Question for the majority who hated it and left - were you actually into the band, or just wandering over in the hope of a spectacle?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

I'm always going to be baffled how so many people can turn up to a Gorillaz gig and be disappointed with Gorillaz music?

Probably because they chose to showcase a downbeat new album that - unlike their previous albums - didn't connect with wide numbers of people.

Any band that does that is heading for a stumble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also – the revolving cast of star guests is just window dressing – it’s nice, but ultimately meaningless if it’s not in service to something that people want to hear.

 

“Lou Reed was there!”

“Ah cool.  What went down?”

“He did an unloved album track from a generally unloved album and went off again”

“Oh”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Probably because they chose to showcase a downbeat new album that - unlike their previous albums - didn't connect with wide numbers of people.

Any band that does that is heading for a stumble.

How many headliners have hit the Pyramid stage at that perfect moment? Few if any to my memory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Also – the revolving cast of star guests is just window dressing – it’s nice, but ultimately meaningless if it’s not in service to something that people want to hear.

 

“Lou Reed was there!”

“Ah cool.  What went down?”

“He did an unloved album track from a generally unloved album and went off again”

“Oh”

I have to admit, the guitar on that performance was  bit ropey.  But I think it's a bit weird to criticise a badn with only three albums from playing stuff of their latest album because the album is "unloved"  WTF did people expect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Also – the revolving cast of star guests is just window dressing – it’s nice, but ultimately meaningless if it’s not in service to something that people want to hear.

 

“Lou Reed was there!”

“Ah cool.  What went down?”

“He did an unloved album track from a generally unloved album and went off again”

“Oh”

Anyone who doesn't love Plastic Beach can fight me tbh. I'll defend that album endlessly.

  • Upvote 13
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Latest Activity

    • my wife and I put two Oxfam volunteering spots in the pot today as we managed to secure tickets in the resale on Sunday, fingers crossed they show up for you soon!
    • We’re after 1 Oxfam spot for my wife, having secured one myself back in Feb.   We’ve been weighing up whether to stick or twist with the cutoff coming up.    Your words sound encouraging though so we might have to stick it out and hammer the Oxfam site for that 1 spot! 
    • This gives us hope! We're lucky enough to work on our laptops all day so this is all possible!
    • So long as you requested your bus via the transport survey before April 15th, you're all good - there haven't been any confirmation emails yet 
    • Did some digging online. Well, you did ask.   There isn't much there that's very recent. An application for planning permission for "use of land for siting of up to 16 low impact residential shelters within a woodland garden setting and associated operational development comprising car park, telephone box, and children's play structure" was rejected in 1999 - though apparently there was a "legal breakthrough" in 2001. This is from 1995:   Clearly it's still in use. A resident called Theo Simon stood for election to the local council (for the Green Party) in 2017. His band, Seize the Day, seems to play Glastonbury every year (at Toad Hall, Small World, sometimes other sets elsewhere). This is a video of their 2019 set:     There's an interview with him, probably filmed at Kings Hill, here. He sounds pretty cool if you ask me.   https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/why-religion-matters/0/steps/73899   This is from a university thesis submitted in 1999:   The King’s Hill Collective The King’s Hill Collective can be seen as solution to increasing pressures of living on the road for Travellers who were bringing up children and as a solution to (and rejection of) mainstream consumerist society by non Travellers many of whom were originally city dwellers. Nevertheless because many of the members had direct travelling experience, this community provided an example of one extreme in a continuum between those Travellers for whom the tag ‘New Age’ is a complete irrelevance and those for whom it is at least understandable if not desirable. This group is on the ‘New Age’, ecologically aware, ideologically ‘hippie’ and ‘sorted’ end of the New Age Traveller continuum discussed in the previous chapter. The site, which overlooks Pilton farm (the site of the Glastonbury Festival), is slowly maturing now with numerous trees, vegetables and a fully functioning water bore hole which supplies the site with drinking water. Water is extracted on a weekly basis using an old petrol engine and pump. The water, which is filtered by a series of sand traps, is inspected on an annual basis. The collective is concerned to demonstrate its willingness to 243adhere to regulations were this is possible and not contrary to its collective ideology. There are 16 plots, each at some stage of the development of the site, having a bender.   The benders are almost exclusively constructed of light green Tarpaulin over a hazel wood matrix. Stainless steel flexi-vents lead from stoves in the benders. These act as chimneys supported by a single branch driven into the earth. The stoves are usually home-made conversions of gas cylinders which have been cut and welded into shape although there was an solid fuel Rayburn installed in one bender during the study period. Inside the benders bedding is arranged on wooden pallets or platforms and there is often an additional gas stove for cooking. Water is supplied either directly from the holding tank or stored in water barrels. Lighting is almost exclusively by candles or ‘hurricane lamps’. Twelve volt batteries and in one case a wind generator supplies electricity for radios and in one case a small black and white television. Some of the more established benders had a variety of trees and shrubs around the canvass construction including apple, pear and fig trees as well as a variety of fruits.   The collective is serviced by a pay telephone located in an old red telephone box. Its position, in the middle of a field, is as incongruous as the lamp post in C.S. Lewis’s Narnia books and is in a way reminiscent of the TARDIS of Doctor Who, adding to the slightly surreal or magical atmosphere of the place. Inside a small domestic pay phone is installed and managed by one of the community.   At the centre of the site is a clearing of grass that acts as a communal area surrounded by a small circular mound inside of which runs a circular ditch in the fashion of a place of worship. In the centre of the circle is a small collection of sea stones collected from a nearby shoreline. There are four gaps in the mound representing the solstices and equinoxes, which correspond to the cardinal points of the compass. Each section of the mound was constructed during the period of the year that it represents. There are symbols representing Beltane and other significant calendar dates placed appropriately on the circle. The King’s Hill site owes its existence to Chris Black, a man who was broadly sympathetic to alternative lifestyles and provided initial financial support to the project. Chris Black purchased the field and ‘loaned’ sixteen plots to a number of Travellers and bender dwellers. The newly formed community developed a ‘constitution’ and organised a system whereby the loan of the plots was paid back over a period of two years through weekly contributions to a central fund. Thus after two years the land belonged to sixteen stakeholders.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...