The stone roses

[Flysheet]

Saw them Tuesday in Halifax, was bouncing (his voice was dodgy but you couldn't hear him for the mass singalong anyway). Fourth time since reunion and going on Friday.

Great live experience, Ian's singing aside, the band are bloody awesome live

[FuzzyDunlop]

Im predicting this will be better.....

[kingcrawler]

 

[Hutchmaster]

On Spotfiy now 

[dentalplan]

So they can write 'em like they used to. Why the fuck did One For All happen then?

[srb]

It really is a beautiful thing, that is the standard! The Roses are back!

[Hutchmaster]

I'm quite liking it, maybe a minute or two too long but a vast improvement on the previous one!

[fatyeti24]

Now that's more like it!

[dentalplan]

1 minute ago, Scruffylovemonster said:

First listen. Obviously much better than all for one but is it not just love spreads v2. 

What did I write?

edit: but no

Edited June 9, 2016 by dentalplan

[H.M.V]

Oh yes! Faith restored. Me likey. Lets all hold hands and put the previous tragedy behind us. 

[FuzzyDunlop]

Better. Much better.

Not what they were, but this is what I was wanting.

 

[EighteenSixty7]

Lovely.

[SwedgeAntilles]

Oh it's good

[EamerRed]

This is SO much better than AFO. 

[addicted2noise]

A bit of a geeky question but is All For One reversed for the intro?

[FuzzyDunlop]

15 minutes ago, dentalplan said:

So they can write 'em like they used to. Why the fuck did One For All happen then?

I think they tried to write a single. Rather than them just writing. They went to write a "hit single". It ended up being horseshit.

This is much better

[fatyeti24]

Lovely vibe to that tune. I like it a lot. 

[dentalplan]

1 minute ago, FuzzyDunlop said:

I think they tried to write a single. Rather than them just writing. They went to write a "hit single". It ended up being horseshit.

This is much better

Yeah, probably. And it worked as they did get a top 20 single, which is some feat if you're not Drake or a house DJ nowadays.

It'd be fun if the wider reaction to this one was that it was shit while we all love it - the reverse of the last song.

10 minutes ago, Scruffylovemonster said:

Maybe being too harsh to be fair but the verses did round very spready to me.  No longer have as much ammo to take the piss out of my mates going to ethiad though! 

Quite possibly but it doesn't come immediately to mind. It's much more subdued than Love Spreads for sure.

12 minutes ago, FuzzyDunlop said:

Better. Much better.

Not what they were, but this is what I was wanting.

I think it's very much 'what they were', to be honest. Big difference being a few hundred listens.

[FuzzyDunlop]

Just now, dentalplan said:

 

I think it's very much 'what they were', to be honest. Big difference being a few hundred listens.

Perhaps you are right.

2nd listen.... I prefer it to the first. 

 

[Purple aki squat]

Noodly guitars and bongos, much more like it

[august1]

sounds like reverand and the makers

[priest17]

I like it, which I wasn't really expecting. I'm a massive fan of them and am happy they're putting out new tunes even if I don't like some of them, shows they give at least a bit of a shit. 

[FuzzyDunlop]

Heard it 4 times now, a bit repetitive, but it's actually good.

Faith restored

[Madyaker]

That's more like! Looking forward to the album a bit more now

[wozwebs]

Love it. Should be great live too.