Jump to content

Weather thread 2015


Swine_Glasto2014
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

we were about to send out search parties. they would have been terrible, terrible, pointless search parties - completely ill-prepared due to the lack of a chart telling them succinctly whether to pack wellies or sunlotion. 

 

and we'd have been without The Nal because he's busy sourcing two pandas to go in his ark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry I was away yesterday. Here is today's graph:

e9dptx.jpg

The average (7.6mm) hasn't changed much over the last couple of days.

So this graph suggests that we'll get a fraction of the rainfall that we had in 2007 and 2014? 2011 wasn't too bad if I remember correctly nor 2009. Slightly muddy here and there but overall not too bad.

2014 was actually pretty damn awful wasn't it then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So this graph suggests that we'll get a fraction of the rainfall that we had in 2007 and 2014? 2011 wasn't too bad if I remember correctly nor 2009. Slightly muddy here and there but overall not too bad.

2014 was actually pretty damn awful wasn't it then?

 

being very slow on the uptake , i.e thick , I've only just understood this graph! Doh :) , looking not so bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm looking at it and it looks fine - sunny and warm...is it just me, or have they updated?

 

It's a fairly good forecast up, but they're still called wetter so I'm not trusting them.

 

They need to swap the Friday and Monday forecasts too. I'd rather not be sitting on a coach in 28 degree weather. Torture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So this graph suggests that we'll get a fraction of the rainfall that we had in 2007 and 2014? 2011 wasn't too bad if I remember correctly nor 2009. Slightly muddy here and there but overall not too bad.

2014 was actually pretty damn awful wasn't it then?

 

Personally I think 2011 was just as bad as 2014, which makes me think the figures for previous years are a bit dodgy. But then 2011's rain was on already soggy ground so that might explain it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I think 2011 was just as bad as 2014, which makes me think the figures for previous years are a bit dodgy. But then 2011's rain was on already soggy ground so that might explain it.

 

2011 was horrendous for mud until in started to dry out later on Saturday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I think 2011 was just as bad as 2014, which makes me think the figures for previous years are a bit dodgy. But then 2011's rain was on already soggy ground so that might explain it.

It just underlines that total rainfall isn't an adequate indicator of how 'bad' the conditions were. To use a sporting analogy, it's like saying a defender is good because he makes lots of tackles - it doesn't paint the full picture. 

2011, in my mind was a bit of a grim struggle - rain from day one, pretty cold and muddy until Saturday or Sunday. Getting around was difficult and I was cold and soggy from before I even got through the gate. 

2014, there were some big storms when a lot of rain fell in a short period of time - like in 2005, too - but overall personally it didn't feel like a struggle at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...