Jump to content

Lineup 2014


Hawky
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Gucci Piggy

    3804

  • the wonderwhy

    2489

  • dentalplan

    4030

  • Com Truise

    2920

Your post about Babyshambles just set me on a Google freefall looking at all of the shows Pete/The Libs used to play at Tap N Tin (which is literally five miles down the road from where I live) making me think about how it used to be a focal point of gigs, new music and alternative culture and how one of the most exciting bands on the planet used to play shows on my doorstep. Now because the live scene is dead it just runs club nights playing shitty music and Pete is a destitute mess. Now I'm sad and I blame you entirely.

Pete Doherty is a junkie oxygen thief and anything he has been involved in could never have been described as exciting. Also, during Oct, Nov and Dec I'm spending close on a grand going to gigs so I'm not sure the live scene is dead either. Maybe it's just shite junkie fuck bands aren't popular anymore?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pete Doherty is a junkie oxygen thief and anything he has been involved in could never have been described as exciting. Also, during Oct, Nov and Dec I'm spending close on a grand going to gigs so I'm not sure the live scene is dead either. Maybe it's just shite junkie fuck bands aren't popular anymore?

Pete Doherty is ill. I understand people don't like the music but I'd encourange everyone not to use the fact that he suffers addiction as an insult against his music. Sorry, the word 'junkie' really grates with me, it's condescending, offensive and only perpetuates an awful stereotype. People with addiction need help and support, not judgement and labeling.

That being said, I agree that (bar one Libertines tracks) his music isn't terribly exciting and Babyshambles are a very 'meh'.

Live music scenes change depending on what you're into. I've gone a year without going to a major (above small venue) gig and then the following year spent a fortune on tours from small academies to stadiums.

Edited by Hubert Cumberdale
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pete Doherty is a prime example of someone having it all at their feet and throwing it away.

If you watch videos from the early days of The Libertines, he looks so healthy and comes across as intelligent and well spoken, as well as being someone who clearly has talent. Compare that to him now, he's basically a carcass pretending to be someone who used to be an incredible songwriter.

He is the Leeds United of music. Could have been huge and succesful going by the early 2000s but too many fuck-ups has reduced him to a bit of a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I liked Dirty Pretty Things' first album, thought there was some great songs on there. Babyshambles have always bored the arse off me though.

I wonder if The Libertines were still together, and if Pete had sorted himself out, or alternatively not become addicted to heroin, how different people's perceptions of them would be. Would there be this mass proclamation of them being the greatest band of this generation? I recall that they weren't even that big until Can't Stand Me Now, and by the time that song came out it was obvious that the band was doomed.

Would they be a Muse/Kasabian/Arctic Monkeys/Biffy Clyro sized band by now, constantly headlining festivals and selling out stadia and arenas or would people have got bored of them by this point? Quite interesting to think about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Pete wants to get better. He has had years to get himself together. He isn't the only musician to have serious drug issues, the difference is, people like Slash and Anthony Keidis for example have managed to overcome their issues because they wanted to. And I just don't think Pete does. Yes, I know it isn't as easy as saying he should give up heroin, because addiction is a bastard, but I can't explain what I mean any other way.

If he could get clean and stay that way, I'm certain The Libertines would release another album. He clearly loves the band still, but he is just too much of a liability to himself and others for them to reform permanently (whilst he is in his current state).

Edited by Andre91
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I liked Dirty Pretty Things' first album, thought there was some great songs on there. Babyshambles have always bored the arse off me though.

I wonder if The Libertines were still together, and if Pete had sorted himself out, or alternatively not become addicted to heroin, how different people's perceptions of them would be. Would there be this mass proclamation of them being the greatest band of this generation? I recall that they weren't even that big until Can't Stand Me Now, and by the time that song came out it was obvious that the band was doomed.

Would they be a Muse/Kasabian/Arctic Monkeys/Biffy Clyro sized band by now, constantly headlining festivals and selling out stadia and arenas or would people have got bored of them by this point? Quite interesting to think about.

Nah, what made Libs big was because they were a band on the verge of breaking up/Pete's problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah, what made Libs big was because they were a band on the verge of breaking up/Pete's problems.

That's the cruel irony of the band, I suppose. The fact that what ruined them made them become more popular. As soon as they started to experience turmoil, they started to turn people's heads. No such thing as bad publicity, I suppose. You only have to look at their billing at Reading and Leeds in 2003, when they were in their prime. Halfway down the Main Stage. Since that booking, Pete admitted he was a heroin addict and he'd been sent to prison, and it was well reported that there was tension. The following year, after just one single, they were moved up to 3rd. They were basically a car crash of a band.

There's nothing the music press love more than a bit of Rock And Roll mythology, and Pete Doherty fit that perfectly. If it weren't for that, they'd still probably be playing pubs in Camden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pete Doherty is ill. I understand people don't like the music but I'd encourange everyone not to use the fact that he suffers addiction as an insult against his music. Sorry, the word 'junkie' really grates with me, it's condescending, offensive and only perpetuates an awful stereotype. People with addiction need help and support, not judgement and labeling.

Have you watched the video where he squirts a syringe of blood over a camera and crew? That is not illness. That is a junkie c**t being a junkie c**t. He has all the money and privilege to sort himself out but chooses not to. That's right, he chooses to be that way. The best thing that could happen to him is to OD, die and stop being a high profile bad example to kids. I couldn't give a shit if your political correctness issues are ruffled over Doherty, most junkies do it because they have no way out and nothing to live for. He has everything and still chooses to adopt the worst traits as a lifestyle. They should take his money away and make him live on the streets with real junkies, bet the twat would change his ways then.

I don't dislike his music BTW and went to see him once, I walked out on the 4th song because of his posturing and antics. That's the only time it's ever happened and the most disappointed I have ever been at a live show. He will never get a penny of my cash again unless he really does sort his shit out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having all the money and privileges in the world doesn't mean that it's any easier to fight any form of addiction. Addiction is a form of illness, and the addiction makes you believe that it is your only way of life. Pete has spoken very openly about his addictions and only recently did an interview about him trying to give up and the difficulties in doing so. to say things like 'the best thing he can do is od' and branding him a 'junkie c**t' I think is wrong.

I throughouly enjoyed seeing him last week, seeing imo one of the best lyricist of our time, and that's how he should be remembered. We don't remember elvis for being a 'junkie', we remember him as the king of rock and roll.

Edited by Chief Scout
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Latest Activity

    • So long as you requested your bus via the transport survey before April 15th, you're all good - there haven't been any confirmation emails yet 
    • Did some digging online. Well, you did ask.   There isn't much there that's very recent. An application for planning permission for "use of land for siting of up to 16 low impact residential shelters within a woodland garden setting and associated operational development comprising car park, telephone box, and children's play structure" was rejected in 1999 - though apparently there was a "legal breakthrough" in 2001. This is from 1995:   Clearly it's still in use. A resident called Theo Simon stood for election to the local council (for the Green Party) in 2017. His band, Seize the Day, seems to play Glastonbury every year (at Toad Hall, Small World, sometimes other sets elsewhere). This is a video of their 2019 set:     There's an interview with him, probably filmed at Kings Hill, here. He sounds pretty cool if you ask me.   https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/why-religion-matters/0/steps/73899   This is from a university thesis submitted in 1999:   The King’s Hill Collective The King’s Hill Collective can be seen as solution to increasing pressures of living on the road for Travellers who were bringing up children and as a solution to (and rejection of) mainstream consumerist society by non Travellers many of whom were originally city dwellers. Nevertheless because many of the members had direct travelling experience, this community provided an example of one extreme in a continuum between those Travellers for whom the tag ‘New Age’ is a complete irrelevance and those for whom it is at least understandable if not desirable. This group is on the ‘New Age’, ecologically aware, ideologically ‘hippie’ and ‘sorted’ end of the New Age Traveller continuum discussed in the previous chapter. The site, which overlooks Pilton farm (the site of the Glastonbury Festival), is slowly maturing now with numerous trees, vegetables and a fully functioning water bore hole which supplies the site with drinking water. Water is extracted on a weekly basis using an old petrol engine and pump. The water, which is filtered by a series of sand traps, is inspected on an annual basis. The collective is concerned to demonstrate its willingness to 243adhere to regulations were this is possible and not contrary to its collective ideology. There are 16 plots, each at some stage of the development of the site, having a bender.   The benders are almost exclusively constructed of light green Tarpaulin over a hazel wood matrix. Stainless steel flexi-vents lead from stoves in the benders. These act as chimneys supported by a single branch driven into the earth. The stoves are usually home-made conversions of gas cylinders which have been cut and welded into shape although there was an solid fuel Rayburn installed in one bender during the study period. Inside the benders bedding is arranged on wooden pallets or platforms and there is often an additional gas stove for cooking. Water is supplied either directly from the holding tank or stored in water barrels. Lighting is almost exclusively by candles or ‘hurricane lamps’. Twelve volt batteries and in one case a wind generator supplies electricity for radios and in one case a small black and white television. Some of the more established benders had a variety of trees and shrubs around the canvass construction including apple, pear and fig trees as well as a variety of fruits.   The collective is serviced by a pay telephone located in an old red telephone box. Its position, in the middle of a field, is as incongruous as the lamp post in C.S. Lewis’s Narnia books and is in a way reminiscent of the TARDIS of Doctor Who, adding to the slightly surreal or magical atmosphere of the place. Inside a small domestic pay phone is installed and managed by one of the community.   At the centre of the site is a clearing of grass that acts as a communal area surrounded by a small circular mound inside of which runs a circular ditch in the fashion of a place of worship. In the centre of the circle is a small collection of sea stones collected from a nearby shoreline. There are four gaps in the mound representing the solstices and equinoxes, which correspond to the cardinal points of the compass. Each section of the mound was constructed during the period of the year that it represents. There are symbols representing Beltane and other significant calendar dates placed appropriately on the circle. The King’s Hill site owes its existence to Chris Black, a man who was broadly sympathetic to alternative lifestyles and provided initial financial support to the project. Chris Black purchased the field and ‘loaned’ sixteen plots to a number of Travellers and bender dwellers. The newly formed community developed a ‘constitution’ and organised a system whereby the loan of the plots was paid back over a period of two years through weekly contributions to a central fund. Thus after two years the land belonged to sixteen stakeholders.
    • K.O.G. were one of my favourite acts at EOTR a couple of years ago. Just a joyful afrobeat danceathon
    • Can tell you about a 1.5k ticket if you're interested lad? Not more at face value I don't think, sorry! Although if I hear owt else back I'll drop you a message 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...