22 replies to this topic

[zahidf]

eFestivals, on 22 March 2011 - 03:09 PM, said:

Yep, you make good points - it was out there to be found if you wanted to find it.

But there was nothing about annoying (or not) a major festival organiser in my decision to agree to remove it. Things were being considered on a deeper and more meaningful level than that.

As plenty of festival organisers could tell you - very probably including Melvin - I don't have any problems about upsetting festival organisers. It's something I've become more than a little known for.

Ah, fair enough. FR made a mistake trying to plug the leak after the fact though IMO: with internet/social networks as it is, any attempts to do that would just make it really obvious that the leak is real. And once the poster is out there, doesn;t matter if it's off forums, people will find it!

Just not commenting would be a much better on their part IMO.Unless they try to get posts with fake posters on it removed from websites as well.

I'm generally for knowing the line up asap, just so i can let the group know and have some thinking time. But again, not going to get annoyed either way!

[rexclark]

Definately well played, the rumours were bang on as usual.

[kibble]

Bang on Neil, well done. I'm liking R/L's idea's of having an ever changing line-up to suit every person of the audience. As some people have suggested, the festival is going to become more 'pop', but I just can't see it anywhere. Almost every band is within the festival's usual genre of Rock and Indie with other elements such as Metal, Rap and Ska this year. The more I look at the line-up the better it gets for me.