47 replies to this topic

[Bluearsedfly]

zeppelin, on 21 June 2010 - 05:28 PM, said:

result with biffy  

far better than what it could be!

They were absolutely amazing at IOW

[Bluearsedfly]

Jonny Hobbs, on 21 June 2010 - 06:20 PM, said:

So, is Biffy pretty much 100%? How do we know this then?

Cryptic clue on their twitter. Well about as cryptic as....Ssssh secret, Show.

[Woppa]

Technically? No. As I said, Biffy may not be everyone's cup of tea. But they aren't "feckin awful" or "quite poor," whether you like them or not.

Edit: Forgot to quote the Waldo who called them "quite poor"

Edited by Woppa, 22 June 2010 - 08:08 PM.

[Bluearsedfly]

godders1966, on 22 June 2010 - 06:50 AM, said:

This sounds good.

And isn't Emily (who runs Park area) close friends with them and there was talk a while ago of 'tweeting' between them about playing?

Maybe, just maybe?

Yeah, nailed on mate. Tom or Ed even posted GLASTONBURY!! on their twitter a few months back( obviously when asked) and was swiftly removed. New albums a bit rubbish though eh?

[formed a band]

really rather low grade band,  certainly not 'special' strokes like em or not would have been more of a coup

[tolywoly]

Biffy looking likely. Girlfriend is very happy.

[Woppa]

formed a band, on 22 June 2010 - 08:07 PM, said:

really rather low grade band,  certainly not 'special' strokes like em or not would have been more of a coup

You don't think one of the UK's best rock bands jetting around europe specifically to do a secret gig at Glasto is "special"? Getting Casablancas to pop up the road to the Park is more special? Really?

[godders1966]

formed a band, on 22 June 2010 - 08:07 PM, said:

really rather low grade band,  certainly not 'special' strokes like em or not would have been more of a coup

Eh?  I assume you're talking about Biffy and not the Chems.