Jump to content




Festival Search

eFestivals Camping Store

Car Parks Open @ 9pm on Tues


  • Please log in to reply
103 replies to this topic

#41 mikeb

mikeb

    I'm a PC .. and so is my li'l green friend in the fridge

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,295 posts

Posted 14 February 2010 - 10:42 PM

Yes, I am sadly well aware that headline cost is a *very* big issue :P But the real cost of using a private vehicle is not just the cost of diesel or whatever and I'll put a significant amount of money on there being a large number of vehicles with only 1 (or 2 at most) on board.  I don't drive - I always use public transport everywhere I go (other than locally) no matter where or when or what for so I know all about the cost and other issues. But the fact is that it can often be cheaper than driving unless you have 3 or 4 peeps in the vehicle !  Unfortunately tho, you can and do get ripped off, esp when travelling to major events or popular destinations such as Glasto of course :P Companies various see it as a real good excuse to make loadsa do$h unfortunately.

Doesn't have to be like that tho does it ? How many £1000's would be saved by a significant reduction in car park space, a significant reduction in staffing, a significant reduction in clearing up cost, a significant reduction in traffic management and Police cost etc. ?  All money that could be used to effectively subsidise alternative options for starters. Private chartered coaches and/or trains (either by the festival or by someone acting specifically on their behalf) would yield significantly better per person prices than a standard walk-up fare.

There are ways and means to make it work but only if there is a strong enough desire to do so. But it will never work for everyone no matter what. There will always be situations where it's totally inappropriate and unrealistic. However, regrettably, I would rather suspect that even if Glasto offered free public transport from major population centres to the festival and back, a great many peeps would still choose to drive.  Cost is without doubt a major issue but it's by no means the only one and it's not always a valid one either.

Edited by mikeb, 14 February 2010 - 10:49 PM.


#42 souldancer

souldancer

    Addicted

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 198 posts

Posted 14 February 2010 - 10:43 PM

I thought at the start of this topic they said that the people going in campervans, motorhomes etc we're going to be let in early as they would obviously have their own facilities so how has it  moved on to any one can drive in early now?  Not sure whats gonna happen with this. :P

#43 beamends

beamends

    Festival Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 370 posts

Posted 14 February 2010 - 11:00 PM

View Postmikeb, on Feb 14 2010, 10:42 PM, said:

Yes, I am sadly well aware that headline cost is a *very* big issue :P But the real cost of using a private vehicle is not just the cost of diesel or whatever and I'll put a significant amount of money on there being a large number of vehicles with only 1 (or 2 at most peeps) on board.  I don't drive - I always use public transport everywhere I go no matter where or when so I know all about the cost and other issues. But the fact is that it can often be cheaper than driving unless you have 3 or 4 peeps in the vehicle !  Unfortunately tho, you can and do get ripped off, esp when travelling to major events or popular destinations such as Glasto of course :P Companies various see it as a real good excuse to make loadsa do$h unfortunately.

Doesn't have to be like that tho does it ? How many £1000's would be saved by a significant reduction in car park space, a significant reduction in staffing, a significant reduction in clearing up cost etc. ?  All money that could be used to effectively subsidise alternative options for starters. Private chartered coaches and/or trains (either by the festival or by someone acting specifically on their behalf) would yield significantly better per person prices than a standard walk-up fare.

There are ways and means to make it work but only if there is a strong enough desire to do so. Regrettably, I would rather suspect that even if Glasto offered free public transport from major population centres to the festival and back, a great many peeps would still choose to drive.  Cost is without doubt a major issue but it's by no means the only one and it's not always a valid one either.

I do agree with you general line of thought, but for us cost is everything. On top of that we live in a rural village with one bus a day, so that car is a necessity - just to get to work if nothing else - a taxi to the nearest town is £10 each way, if one is available, they are few and far between here. Maybe things will change one day, but as a society we'd have to return to a 1950's pace of life and work patterns, and I cannot see that ever happening as by the time the oil really does run out Plan B (whatever it turns out to be) will be up and running.  

Actually, trying to be positive, the 1950's bit has just reminded me that back then such an event would charter trains (makes the fares a lot cheaper) - that could be an option?

#44 port

port

    Festival Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 312 posts

Posted 15 February 2010 - 12:41 AM

how many £15 for car parking spaces do you think there are?     thats a helluva lot of money to lose. plus the fact that not everyone can afford to travel light, its an expensive six days buying all your food and drink on site,   so if you bring these with you along with cooking equipment then its a bit difficult getting them on a bus.  If I couldn't bring these with me then I for one would not be attending.

If you want to save the planet then why not just get everybody to walk there ? don't let any of the traders use their vehicles to bring food in, then there would be no generators to run the food vans either. everybody bring f'kin cheesy straws to last them 6 days . lets cut carbon emissions as well by no lighting system on any of the stages .....fuk it,  no amplified music either , no tractors burning fuel to take away the long drops .....the list goes on .......

.if people want to use whatever means to get there thats up to them ....i have to travel 450 miles  just to get there  , thers no way I would be doing that by bus ........take away the car drivers and see how long the festival survives in this day and age , more to the point take away the car driver from this country and the government would be skint.

Edited by port, 15 February 2010 - 12:41 AM.


#45 glastofreak

glastofreak

    Festival Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 15 February 2010 - 01:12 AM

View Postmikeb, on Feb 14 2010, 10:42 PM, said:

Yes, I am sadly well aware that headline cost is a *very* big issue :P But the real cost of using a private vehicle is not just the cost of diesel or whatever and I'll put a significant amount of money on there being a large number of vehicles with only 1 (or 2 at most) on board.  I don't drive - I always use public transport everywhere I go (other than locally) no matter where or when or what for so I know all about the cost and other issues. But the fact is that it can often be cheaper than driving unless you have 3 or 4 peeps in the vehicle !  Unfortunately tho, you can and do get ripped off, esp when travelling to major events or popular destinations such as Glasto of course :P Companies various see it as a real good excuse to make loadsa do$h unfortunately.

Doesn't have to be like that tho does it ? How many £1000's would be saved by a significant reduction in car park space, a significant reduction in staffing, a significant reduction in clearing up cost, a significant reduction in traffic management and Police cost etc. ?  All money that could be used to effectively subsidise alternative options for starters. Private chartered coaches and/or trains (either by the festival or by someone acting specifically on their behalf) would yield significantly better per person prices than a standard walk-up fare.

There are ways and means to make it work but only if there is a strong enough desire to do so. But it will never work for everyone no matter what. There will always be situations where it's totally inappropriate and unrealistic. However, regrettably, I would rather suspect that even if Glasto offered free public transport from major population centres to the festival and back, a great many peeps would still choose to drive.  Cost is without doubt a major issue but it's by no means the only one and it's not always a valid one either.
This is all true but for people on a budget (yes I know this is virtually everyone) it is cheaper and usually easier to travel by car.  It is politically and economically impossible to raise the cost of driving to the point where it would be cheaper to travel by train or bus to the festival.  Especially if you include the amount that people can carry on these forms of transport.   By economically I mean any cost that hits the private car owner will hit the transport companies which will significantly raise the cost of goods.  I do agree that is not a good example of the green credentials of the festival to open the car parks early but they are not being allowed access to the site until the normal opening times.  What has also been mentioned is that cars parked up will cause a lot less pollution than cars sitting in traffic and people coming later, should (that magic word) cause less pollution as well.  The whole problem has been caused by the popularity of the festival, people coming earlier and earlier to get to the site they want to go to.  In the festivals position what is to be done?  Leave it as last year with the same problems?  Open Wednesday night and have people trying to pitch tents in the dark or open for cars on the Thursday going back to the travel problems that occurred in the past ?  On the money making side I don’t feel that the festival will make much money (especially this year as demand is unknown) as any extra burger vans will only get one nights worth of trade and if you get 4 vans paying £2000 each that is only £8000 extra staffing and hire of fields would more than cover that.

#46 Alty Mike

Alty Mike

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 69 posts

Posted 15 February 2010 - 03:08 AM

I've got to agree with the couple of people above, so many people here seem to be missing the point. GFL have GOT to reduce the traffic/conjestion from last year. They can not make people leave cars at home and really that doesn't bother me as i'd never come by public transport.*waits for abuse* So the only way todo that is to get cars in the carparks asap. As much as i praise the festival for being Green, a couple less Green awards would not effect the future of the festival; a lot of local complaints would at the next licence renewal. ME has to put his neighbours first.
Last year we were sat in traffic off the m5 for 10 hours with the car/ac/stereo running the entire time. I'm sure that caused alot of pollution.

#47 mikeb

mikeb

    I'm a PC .. and so is my li'l green friend in the fridge

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,295 posts

Posted 15 February 2010 - 03:11 AM

Based on limited publicly available information,  the average number of people per vehicle is 2.5 in round figures.  Nothing has changed attendance-wise since 2007 of course. This very much implies to me that the number of vehicles with 1 or 2 people in is very significant given the fact that so many peeps claim to always have 3 or 4 in their car and not to mention the number of families of course who no doubt almost certainly come by car.  There is absolutely nothing in any way wrong with a car used responsibly and having 4 peeps in a car is without doubt being used responsibly.  The cost of driving on your own and quite likely even with just 1 passenger is unlikely to be less in real terms than travelling by a more sustainable means ... unless you want to make it so in order to justify your position of course !  As for alleged loss of funding to the festival due to less cars - get real !! I doubt the income comes remotely close to paying for the bl**dy car parks and all the associated costs at all :P Particularly so this year of course with all the additional clean-up costs that will without doubt be necessary hence the increased car park ticket price this year I guess.

However, the fact is that this year, Glasto appears to be predicting a 15% increase in the number of vehicles.  Or at least that's what they appear to be expecting and have planned for as a matter of routine.  This equates to them expecting around a 30% reduction in the number of peeps coming by public transport this year as compared to 2007.  That hardly constitutes "encouraging peeps out of their cars and on to public transport" now does it, even if that is what they believe is the absolute worst-case scenario.  No matter what, it's only an estimate and could equally well be a best-case scenario of course !   Something tells me that there's a *very* good reason why more up-to-date figures on vehicles and public transport use aren't published ... they would likely be somewhat embarrassing ! And figures for 2010 and 2011 highly likely to be even more so I reckon.

The lots of me.me.me bad attitude above comes as no surprise but what I always do find very pleasantly surprising is the number of groups of peeps who DO come by public transport. Mostly young(ish) peeps but there can't honestly by that many peeps these days well over the legal age for driving who don't have a car themselves or don't have access to one.  I'm quite sure they don't all do it because it's more expensive, less convenient,  because they all want to save the world or for any of the other various standard responses that get thrown out of the pram when car drivers get asked questions and/or asked to act responsibly :(  Oh yeah, they're fairly often laden with shedloads of stuff including cooking gear, food, trolleys of booze etc. as well.  I'm talking by train here rather than coach BTW, I have no experience of using the coach services.

Also, regards my somewhat tongue-in-cheek car parks open Wednesday suggestion ...  nope, you definitely don't have to worry about putting tents up in the dark at all.  Why on earth would you need to think about doing that FFS ? You can simply sleep in your car just like you would/will be doing on the Tuesday.  There's absolutely no difference at all between what I suggested earlier and what is planned other than it being very much LESS convenient for YOU - the very people who are causing all the problems that the festival feels it has no choice but to address.  YOU'RE the people causing the inconvenience to the locals and those who choose to travel sustainably by being irresponsible.  So what makes YOU think that YOU deserve priority treatment of some kind ?  Should quite rightly be more a case of cause problems and get a bl**dy good slap surely :P  Grow up, get real and all that :P

So there you have it: If car parks were to open 2000 hours Wednesday, no problems whatsoever for the locals and you don't have to leave the car park and put up tents in the dark unless you want to. So where exactly is the problem ?  You get to use the car, those wanting to use sustainable transport get to come as normal, locals aren't inconvenienced in any way and everyone wins it appears :lol:  I don't understand your problem at all, seems like a totally ideal solution to me and clearly meets everyone's needs ... unless you're just having a me.me.me stylee tantrum of course which I suppose is only to be expected when selfish and inconsiderate car drivers are trying to justify their often irresponsible actions :P

With 30% of peeps apparently coming by public transport and those mostly arriving on Wednesday, such a scheme with a late opening of car parks would surely tend to increase the use of public transport, hopefully to around the 50% level at least.  It would also tend to balance arrivals more towards 50:50 across Wed/Thurs as was pretty much the case in the past and as the festival no doubt always intended it to be.  Like I said, all problems apparently solved with no side-effects or unpredictable issues and a positive environmental benefit into the bargain ... SO WHY NOT !!!!!!!


PS: I do fully understand that the above would be detrimental to those responsible drivers who also bring 3 passengers with them so no need to shout about that aspect.  It is quite clear that there are some vehicles with a sensible number of passengers but regrettably it is also clear that by far the majority probably do not.  It is this apparent majority of irresponsible car drivers who are the primary cause of all of the problems and not the small minority of responsible drivers but unfortunately there is no particularly easy and non-problematic way that I can think of just now to differentiate the two :lol: As I've said several times before tho, there is nothing at all wrong with private vehicles being used responsibly, I am not suggesting cars effectively be banned or anything suchlike.

Edited by mikeb, 15 February 2010 - 04:49 AM.


#48 steveyt

steveyt

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 49 posts

Posted 15 February 2010 - 04:19 AM

I predict a riot....I predict a riot

#49 grumpyhack

grumpyhack

    staying out for the summer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,608 posts

Posted 15 February 2010 - 08:02 AM

The greenest solution is simply not to hold the festival.  That way you wouldn't get 200,000 people (punters, traders, bands, support teams etc) travelling to Somerset from all over the country/world in the first place.
But that's not an option that many of the above 200,000 would want.
So everything is about damage limitation.
That has to be achieved with a combination of carrot and stick.
Sticks are easy and within GFL's control - for example shoving up car parking charges.
Carrots are much harder as things like the cost of public transport are outside their control and subject to the government's transport policies and strategies.
In France public transport is heavily state subsidised.  Trains are clean, cheap, and run frequently and, as a result, have high occupancy rates.
Sadly, the UK rail network was decimated by Dr Beeching and we've never recovered.

The main licencing issue is about minimising the inconvenience to local people still trying to go about their daily business with heavily congested roads during the festival week.

Reducing car traffic by staggering arrival times must surely help. But we'll never get a major switch to public transport till the service and infrastructure is in place at an affordable price.

#50 YetAnotherOldHippy

YetAnotherOldHippy

    Addicted

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 118 posts

Posted 15 February 2010 - 08:16 AM

View Postgrumpyhack, on Feb 15 2010, 08:02 AM, said:

...we'll never get a major switch to public transport till the service and infrastructure is in place at an affordable price.

The problem with the change to earlier-opening of car parks is the potential for a huge swing away from public transport and into cars.

Perhaps somebody could set up a poll on here to get an idea how many will now be driving instead? I'd have a go at one, but wouldn't know where to start  :P

#51 eFestivals

eFestivals

    the value of your god may go down as well as up

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 24,631 posts

Posted 15 February 2010 - 08:43 AM

View PostYetAnotherOldHippy, on Feb 15 2010, 08:16 AM, said:

The problem with the change to earlier-opening of car parks is the potential for a huge swing away from public transport and into cars.

Perhaps somebody could set up a poll on here to get an idea how many will now be driving instead? I'd have a go at one, but wouldn't know where to start  :P

Why would there be more drivers because the car parks open earlier? :P

Driving doesn't get any one into the fest any quicker than they otherwise would.

And because the early car parks are car parks and not a party, their existence is not appealing to everyone. At worst it should only mean that those who aimed to be there for 8am last year will actually be there for 8am this time around. Those that aimed to arrive later will no doubt still plan to arrive later.

#52 EasyUserName

EasyUserName

    Addicted

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 139 posts

Posted 15 February 2010 - 08:49 AM

All this carpark talk is making me twitchy!  If I was camping over in the West (say Dairy Ground), I think I'd just turn up mid-morning, and this new situation would be ideal.  However, this year, I wanted to try someplace new, near Kidney Mead etc - which, as I understand it from years gone by, is very competitive!  As a result, it'll likely now be a night-time arrival in the carpark.  I agree with efest that it won't see me in the site earlier than 8am, but it will see me further up the line to get in than if I arrived later.

Stupid change.

#53 usatoglas

usatoglas

    Addicted

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 218 posts

Posted 15 February 2010 - 08:53 AM

i wonder how many will actually arrive overnight in their car etc.

It certainly has the potential for loads to turn up and cause all sorts of control problems with people being told to stay in/with their vehicles etc.


I might just bowl up to see what happens.  

In theory a reasonably good idea to stop traffic congestion very early on wed but what happens in reality cuold go either way.

#54 Ladybug-nina

Ladybug-nina

    Addicted

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 140 posts

Posted 15 February 2010 - 08:59 AM

I think because we are able to leave Essex at about 6pm on the Tuesday, I feel happy about the carpark opening at 9pm. If I couldnt leave until Wednesday morning, then I would live in fear that our beloved Triangle would be full. This every year gives me stress for the whole journey!
I really dont think they could physicaly keep us in our cars for the whole evening. I was wondering if we are all going to decend on the local pub?!

#55 eFestivals

eFestivals

    the value of your god may go down as well as up

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 24,631 posts

Posted 15 February 2010 - 09:04 AM

View Postusatoglas, on Feb 15 2010, 08:53 AM, said:

It certainly has the potential for loads to turn up and cause all sorts of control problems with people being told to stay in/with their vehicles etc.
It has that potential IF Glastonbury are amateurs at crowd management. Are they? :P

It has that potential IF those who arrive early actually have no wish to gain any advantage for themselves because they get thrown off the car parks for not abiding by whatever rules are in place, or perhaps even that they have no wish to be at the festival at all (if the rules include a right of ticket confiscation from those who won't abide by the rules).

I'm sure that Glasto will have thought it thru, and I'm sure that they're more than confident that it can be done sensibly. And from that, so am I. :-)

Back in early 2002 no one believed that the fence could be secured, but the festival believed differently. The fence was secured.

It might take harsh rules with harsh enforcement from Glasto for the early car parks to work as they want them to, but no one will be forced to enter the early car parks and so accept whatever rules are in place: if you don't like them, don't come.

For certain: it will only take one person to be seen being thrown off site and their festival ticket taken from them for everyone else to become as meek and compliant as it's possible for anyone to be.

#56 beamends

beamends

    Festival Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 370 posts

Posted 15 February 2010 - 09:17 AM

Just a point about why this might have become such an issue. I think I'm right in saying that 2009 was the first year that the festival was advertised as being from Wednesday to Sunday, hence a lot of people who would normally aim to arrive sometime before Friday evening quite rightly supposed that they might miss something (which they would - Wednesday & Thursday are wonderful to chill out and explore the site) and arrived first thing Wednesday.

{conspiracy theory mode}

Now, if you had a festival and wanted to extend it's duration but were sure that MDC would never go for it, "accidently" getting the punters to turn up early so causing traffic problems would be a neat trick, as you the need a plan to stop it happening again and MDC would be hard put to object. Then, as pointed out, having lots of people hanging about might cause problems, so next year lets open the site a little earlier Mr. MDC. And so on....

Strictly tounge in cheek of course  :P

{/conspiracy theory mode}

#57 cejx

cejx

    LEAVE NO TRACE

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,509 posts

Posted 15 February 2010 - 09:28 AM

View PosteFestivals, on Feb 15 2010, 09:04 AM, said:

It has that potential IF Glastonbury are amateurs at crowd management. Are they? :P

It has that potential IF those who arrive early actually have no wish to gain any advantage for themselves because they get thrown off the car parks for not abiding by whatever rules are in place, or perhaps even that they have no wish to be at the festival at all (if the rules include a right of ticket confiscation from those who won't abide by the rules).

I'm sure that Glasto will have thought it thru, and I'm sure that they're more than confident that it can be done sensibly. And from that, so am I. :-)

Back in early 2002 no one believed that the fence could be secured, but the festival believed differently. The fence was secured.

It might take harsh rules with harsh enforcement from Glasto for the early car parks to work as they want them to, but no one will be forced to enter the early car parks and so accept whatever rules are in place: if you don't like them, don't come.

For certain: it will only take one person to be seen being thrown off site and their festival ticket taken from them for everyone else to become as meek and compliant as it's possible for anyone to be.

I agree with this - reading through various peeps posts on this thread, they are suggesting rocking up at 9pm and starting the party - which may not be the case if they have ticket confiscation threatened.  Also, turning up at the gates pissed/off ones head at 8am surely will run the risk of more stringent searches for those....

I however, will be tucked up in a comfy warm travel lodge!

#58 FunkyDenz

FunkyDenz

    SafeandSounds Nottingham fundraising multivenue event 25/9/2011

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,780 posts

Posted 15 February 2010 - 09:52 AM

View Postmikeb, on Feb 15 2010, 03:11 AM, said:

Based on limited publicly available information,  the average number of people per vehicle is 2.5 in round figures.  Nothing has changed attendance-wise since 2007 of course. This very much implies to me that the number of vehicles with 1 or 2 people in is very significant given the fact that so many peeps claim to always have 3 or 4 in their car and not to mention the number of families of course who no doubt almost certainly come by car.  There is absolutely nothing in any way wrong with a car used responsibly and having 4 peeps in a car is without doubt being used responsibly.

What about those of us who drive small, "environmentally friendlier" cars, who can not realistically fit 2 passengers and 3 people's camping gear in the car?
I drive a Citroen C1, which has low CO2 emissions and high MPG, yet it is small, so I can only take one passenger.
I have thought about travelling by public transport, but, as I am travelling on my own*, I would have too much to carry by myself from the coach to the campsite.


*offering lift-share for 1 passenger

#59 thazlewood

thazlewood

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 22 posts

Posted 15 February 2010 - 10:15 AM

Something else that crossed my mind (and not something that I guess anyone will know the answer to until we get there) is whether the early arrivals will be stuck in the car parks furthest from the actual entrances so as to enable those arriving at a more 'normal' time to be parked up quicker?

The trade-off is that you are parked and half-way 'in' to the festival (for your benefit), off the public roads (for the sake of the locals) but you have a fair old hike in the morning to get in and are potentially easier to police for the car-park rules, less likely to be trying to gain early access to the fest, etc etc... I'm not sure of the science of where they park people as I've arrived at about the same time for the last few years and always been parked in COMPLETELY different places, once very close to PGB and once to PGC.

This is entirely irrelevant in the overall context of things, just my random thoughts.

#60 redmosquito

redmosquito

    Festival Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,110 posts

Posted 15 February 2010 - 11:44 AM

Has there been any indication as to whether the camper van fields will open at 12 on the Tuesday or if it will only be the car parks?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users