http://www.efestivals.co.uk/festivals/endo...iew-taffe.shtml
Simon Taffe chats to eFestivals
#1
Posted 02 February 2010 - 01:08 PM
#2
Posted 03 February 2010 - 11:22 AM
Interesting stuff about "exclusivity" contracts.
Was chatting with a legal-type-expert of some kind, we were both a little drunk....and he assured me that such deals are illegal under European Law. It's not the exclusivity clauses themselves apparently but just offering a contract that says that a band can't play another festival in England but can play one in Spain or Holland, Scotland, Ireland is a criminal act.....something to do with "restrictive co-ertion" or sommat.
The thing is no-one's ever going to challenge it....the bands aren't, they're getting the dosh, and EOTR can't cos it would be hugely expensive, take forever and they'd just look like moaning minnies.......but if one jumped up bureaucrat ever got it into his (and it would have to be a "him") head to do something, this could all change.
#3
Posted 03 February 2010 - 11:58 AM
I really, REALLY hope he gets the headliners he wants and isn't scuppered by other festivals.
#4
Posted 03 February 2010 - 01:54 PM
#5
Posted 05 February 2010 - 12:21 AM
#8
Posted 07 February 2010 - 07:38 PM
Interesting comments from geofelgie about the contracts too. I wonder if *we* could try to pressure the festivals? I think geofelgie is right that the bands can't/won't complain (even if they won, they'd risk not being booked at all, next time). But maybe sternly-worded letters from prospective attendees might have some effect?
Pleased to see that EoTR's reputation is leading bands to approach them directly (especially Wilco
#9
Posted 08 February 2010 - 10:40 AM
geofelgie, on Feb 3 2010, 11:22 AM, said:
Interesting stuff about "exclusivity" contracts.
Was chatting with a legal-type-expert of some kind, we were both a little drunk....and he assured me that such deals are illegal under European Law. It's not the exclusivity clauses themselves apparently but just offering a contract that says that a band can't play another festival in England but can play one in Spain or Holland, Scotland, Ireland is a criminal act.....something to do with "restrictive co-ertion" or sommat.
The thing is no-one's ever going to challenge it....the bands aren't, they're getting the dosh, and EOTR can't cos it would be hugely expensive, take forever and they'd just look like moaning minnies.......but if one jumped up bureaucrat ever got it into his (and it would have to be a "him") head to do something, this could all change.
(that doesn't mean I think they're a good thing btw)
If it was illegal, than any and all contracts between any two businesses are similarly illegal, because that's all any exclusivity contract for a band to play a festival is. No one is forcing either side to agree that contract between them.
#10
Posted 08 February 2010 - 12:04 PM
All irrelevant anyway and we really dont want the euro-lawmakers mucking about with festivals, sounds like its hard enough to jump through all the local council hoops.
#11
Posted 08 February 2010 - 12:15 PM
#12
Posted 10 February 2010 - 02:31 PM
Say (please god let this happen) that Simon Taffe gets Sufjan Stevens to a exclusive contract at this years EOTR. This would be a big coup for EOTR, and a feather in its cap. Without a deal in place, latitude could just whack down more money and have them play their festival as well, thus diluting the impact it would have for eotr.
Expect this to be an issue if Live Republic decide to do a september boutique festival. At least bestival seems to have a different modus operandi to EOTR, and thus has a differing (but not completely) booking policy. Live rpeublic would aggressively compete with EOTR.
Nice points about the secret sets by Simon too. I am gutted I missed Okkervil river, but charlie parr whilst necking from a bottle of whiskey was excellent, esp as me and my mate had to jump a fence to get in!
#13
Posted 10 February 2010 - 04:08 PM
(And if Mr Stevens is watching I'd say an exclusivilty deal with EOTR would be a really, really, good idea.
Disagree about Live Republic competing with EOTR rather than Bestival.....Bestival is the 25,000 cater-to-many-different-tastes boutique-ish festival that is probably as similar to Latitude as you can get.
EOTR is small and specialised.......even if Live Republic wanted the odd Fleet Foxes, Bon Iver type booking they wouldn't want to fill the whole bill with EOTR type stuff.
#14
Posted 11 February 2010 - 11:27 AM
geofelgie, on Feb 10 2010, 04:08 PM, said:
(And if Mr Stevens is watching I'd say an exclusivilty deal with EOTR would be a really, really, good idea.
Disagree about Live Republic competing with EOTR rather than Bestival.....Bestival is the 25,000 cater-to-many-different-tastes boutique-ish festival that is probably as similar to Latitude as you can get.
EOTR is small and specialised.......even if Live Republic wanted the odd Fleet Foxes, Bon Iver type booking they wouldn't want to fill the whole bill with EOTR type stuff.
I guess it depends if LR want to go down the slightly dancey leftfield hedonistic path that Bestival seem to be on, or the chilled out americana vibe of EOTR. I'm not sure there'd be enough of a market for two mid sept 20,000+ 'boutique' festivals, so it'd be interesting to see how Bestival would react.
#15
Posted 23 February 2010 - 05:22 PM
#16
Posted 13 March 2010 - 09:55 PM
"Many clubs showed interest but now it doesnt matter which ones because Ive chosen the best one," Nemeth told Vasarnap Reggel.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














