Jump to content




Festival Search

eFestivals Camping Store

Recent Topics

gaps in U2's just announced June 2010 dates


  • Please log in to reply
288 replies to this topic

#1 tevaburger

tevaburger

    Festival Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 710 posts

Posted 26 October 2009 - 02:13 PM

the rumors that U2 were definitely out of Glasto consideration as they were booked for the Meadowlands in New Jersey over Glasto weekend are now unfounded, as that date is in July. and...the official dates just released show a far too convenient gap btw shows on june 23 and 30...

obviously they wouldn't be using that 'spider' thing for glasto, so they could just fly over with their musical equipment and then head back to North America for the remainder of the tour.

#2 DeclarationOfWar

DeclarationOfWar

    Addicted

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 215 posts

Posted 26 October 2009 - 02:22 PM

Hmmm interesting  :lol:

#3 scott_b_

scott_b_

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 51 posts

Posted 26 October 2009 - 02:24 PM

Hope not. They're sh1t.  :lol:

#4 Bort

Bort

    Festival Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,065 posts

Posted 26 October 2009 - 02:49 PM

Interesting.  So Pulp, U2, and The Rolling Stones?

Edited by Bort, 26 October 2009 - 02:50 PM.


#5 st00ka

st00ka

    Festival Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,067 posts

Posted 26 October 2009 - 02:51 PM

View PostBort, on Oct 26 2009, 02:49 PM, said:

Interesting.  So Pulp, U2, and The Rolling Stones?

Lets hope not.

#6 bigal9

bigal9

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 39 posts

Posted 26 October 2009 - 02:53 PM

as soon as the pulp rumour looked like it was happening, i knew there would be some bad news on the way! U2 please god NNOOOOOOOOOO!

#7 sime

sime

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 86 posts

Posted 26 October 2009 - 02:54 PM

View PostBort, on Oct 26 2009, 02:49 PM, said:

Interesting.  So Pulp, U2, and The Rolling Stones?

I'd be happy with those headliners

#8 Langdale Wolf

Langdale Wolf

    Matt Smith > David Tennant

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,391 posts

Posted 26 October 2009 - 02:57 PM

View Posttevaburger, on Oct 26 2009, 03:13 PM, said:

obviously they wouldn't be using that 'spider' thing for glasto, so they could just fly over with their musical equipment and then head back to North America for the remainder of the tour.

So U2 - well known for being difficult and outrageously expensive - are going to fly back during a break in their American tour - without most of their set - just to play a festival they appear to have next to no time for?!

Hmm..... I think not.  Dream on.

I don't mind U2's music (and wouldn't mind seeing them actually), but I've nothing but disdain for Bono and his vomit-inducing preaching.

They ain't going to play people.

#9 radioshed

radioshed

    Addicted

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 222 posts

Posted 26 October 2009 - 02:57 PM

View Postsime, on Oct 26 2009, 02:54 PM, said:

I'd be happy with those headliners

Me too, as I'm happy if there is one good pyramid headliner each year. (Pulp)

Edited by radioshed, 26 October 2009 - 02:57 PM.


#10 The-Sir

The-Sir

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts

Posted 26 October 2009 - 02:59 PM

I dont think Pulp are strong enough to headline the festival to be honest.  They certainly dont have as many sing-along songs as Blur or The Boss.

#11 The-Sir

The-Sir

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts

Posted 26 October 2009 - 03:00 PM

Oh and yeah, U2 suck balls.

#12 Langdale Wolf

Langdale Wolf

    Matt Smith > David Tennant

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,391 posts

Posted 26 October 2009 - 03:02 PM

View PostThe-Sir, on Oct 26 2009, 03:59 PM, said:

I dont think Pulp are strong enough to headline the festival to be honest.  They certainly dont have as many sing-along songs as Blur or The Boss.

Bullshit.

See Youtube clips of their previous headlining performances.  Pretty damn good.

I would say they have plenty more sing-a-long tunes than Springsteen, and daresay they'd be a damn sight more enjoyable too <insert can of worms opening emoticon here>

#13 bigal9

bigal9

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 39 posts

Posted 26 October 2009 - 03:04 PM

View PostThe-Sir, on Oct 26 2009, 03:59 PM, said:

I dont think Pulp are strong enough to headline the festival to be honest.  They certainly dont have as many sing-along songs as Blur or The Boss.

??????????????????????? pulp arnt strong enough to headline????????????? im 27 and even i know they did it in 95! i really hope they do headline!

#14 swede

swede

    ONE LIFE TO LIVE !

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,036 posts

Posted 26 October 2009 - 03:16 PM

If U2 do headline I'll be as far away from that steaming pile of turd as I can :)

#15 st00ka

st00ka

    Festival Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,067 posts

Posted 26 October 2009 - 03:17 PM

View PostThe-Sir, on Oct 26 2009, 02:59 PM, said:

I dont think Pulp are strong enough to headline the festival to be honest.

I never quite understand the "this band isn't big enough to headline" argument haven't the so called best headline performances always come from bands who stepped up a level.

#16 grumpyhack

grumpyhack

    staying out for the summer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,608 posts

Posted 26 October 2009 - 03:22 PM

Ooooooh so are U2 the ultimate Marmite band?  Love 'em or hate 'em.

With Glasto's good causes support it would be a test of whether Bono was prepared to put his money where his mouth is.

#17 The-Sir

The-Sir

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts

Posted 26 October 2009 - 03:24 PM

Maybe I'm just not "with it" anymore but they've never interested me.  A few decent pop songs but were never on par with the majority of britpop bands.  How I see it, if Pulp headline it would *puts on helmet for inevitable abuse coming my way* be akin to Supergrass headlining.

#18 st00ka

st00ka

    Festival Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,067 posts

Posted 26 October 2009 - 03:26 PM

View Postgrumpyhack, on Oct 26 2009, 03:22 PM, said:

Ooooooh so are U2 the ultimate Marmite band?  Love 'em or hate 'em.

Nah you either hate them or you are a moron.

:)

#19 bigal9

bigal9

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 39 posts

Posted 26 October 2009 - 03:28 PM

whats wrong wiv supergrass???? :) :) :P :D :) :) :) :P        
everyone has different tastes and opinions but Pulp never got the recognition they deserved!
you can take your helmet off now haha  :)

#20 paulo999

paulo999

    Festival Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,354 posts

Posted 26 October 2009 - 03:37 PM

View PostLangdale Wolf, on Oct 26 2009, 02:57 PM, said:

So U2 - well known for being difficult and outrageously expensive - are going to fly back during a break in their American tour - without most of their set - just to play a festival they appear to have next to no time for?!

Their set being in the US isn't relevant. Even if it were sitting in trucks up at Bath and West, it simply wouldn't fit.

So the question is, would they use an alternative 'Pyramid sized' set as a one off? Normally the answer would obviously be 'no', and of course there would be the money thing too.

But, U2's star has been wobbling a bit of late, in the view of some observers. So there could be an incentive that hasn't existed before, tying up of course with the massive exposure the 40th is going to bring.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users