50 replies to this topic

[jackass]

would you say its too early for him to come back or would you like to see him back as i've heard hes absolutely amazing live..

thoughts??

[fullfathom5]

Defo - Macca, Radiohead & Gorillaz as headliners then!

[ShadyBlueBell]

jackass, on Sep 24 2009, 09:27 PM, said:

would you say its too early for him to come back or would you like to see him back as i've heard hes absolutely amazing live..

thoughts??

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !!!

[remote]

Thought he was very good in 2004, but I think it's one of those one off things. I doubt he'll be back.

[brettredmayne]

That could mean Muse and McCartney again, far too similar to 2004

[Zacko]

I'd love for Macca to play but it would be hard for him to match his 2004 performance judging from the footage I've seen.

Also forgot all about the possibility of Gorillaz, I think that could be a very good shout actually what with Damon probably having amazing memories from playing with Blur this year.

[lak attack]

that would be awesome, i would love to see Sir Paul so much

[drewsstrat]

I'd be up for that!  He almost puts Springsteen to shame with 2 1/2 hr gigs on his current US tour with 35 songs , packed with hit after hit from the beatles, wings and solo career

[Wooderson]

It would make zero sense for them to have him back. It was a one-off in 2004. Forget about it people. Sir Paul is not Coldplay or Radiohead who will play year after year ad nauseum.

[When Jokers Attack]

I Wish! Won't happen though, One off performance

[Zacko]

2004 really does look like it had a great lineup..

Macca, Oasis (ok they were shit blah blah, still a huge band) Muse, Morrissey, Kings of Leon, Groove Armada, Elbow, Chemical Brothers, Kasabian, The Killers, Basement Jaxx, Orbital, James Brown,

[ampersand]

reckon this would be the only thing that would have me registering in april.

[Tugger2k]

Wooderson, on Sep 24 2009, 11:28 PM, said:

A)It would make zero sense for them to have him back. It was a one-off in 2004. Forget about it people. Sir Paul is not Coldplay or Radiohead who will play year after year ad nauseum.

A) thank the spaghetti monster for that - not that i dont love the beatles, just the thought of seeing a man who 1 - can no longer sing and 2 - after leaving the greatest band on earth went on to write the frog chorus, fills me with dread

nothing wrong with that idea

[tonyblair]

drewsstrat, on Sep 24 2009, 10:51 PM, said:

I'd be up for that!  He almost puts Springsteen to shame with 2 1/2 hr gigs on his current US tour with 35 songs , packed with hit after hit from the beatles, wings and solo career

you mean compared to Bruce's 3 hour shows??

admittedly, it's not a set of Beatles hits, but that would be silly








or would it ?

[Wooderson]

Tugger2k, on Sep 25 2009, 08:31 AM, said:

A) thank the spaghetti monster for that - not that i dont love the beatles, just the thought of seeing a man who 1 - can no longer sing and 2 - after leaving the greatest band on earth went on to write the frog chorus, fills me with dread

Were you not singin' along to "Penny Lane" for with the rest of us 80,000 bruv!? Whats wasnt to like bout his vocals in 2004?

- - -

Oh and knocking "The Frog Chorus" is way below a man of your dignity and taste Tuggs. It is TOTALLY cool. A quintessential slice of batshit-crazy British genius IMHO.

[Tugger2k]

Wooderson, on Sep 25 2009, 09:41 AM, said:

Were you not singin' along to "Penny Lane" for with the rest of us 80,000 bruv!? Whats wasnt to like bout his vocals in 2004?

- - -

Oh and knocking "The Frog Chorus" is way below a man of your dignity and taste Tuggs. It is TOTALLY cool. A quintessential slice of batshit-crazy British genius IMHO.

i missed 04 - thank the maker - 2 headline acts that i would rather have a root canal with no anesthetic than see and one bloke with a fingernails worth more talent than ringo

[Wooderson]

Tugger2k, on Sep 25 2009, 09:44 AM, said:

i missed 04 - thank the maker - 2 headline acts that i would rather have a root canal with no anesthetic than see and one bloke with a fingernails worth more talent than ringo

You missed out in ways that arent easy to explain. Multiply your adoration for Doves by 1,000 and then youre close to how I feel about Macca at Glasto 5 years ago. It was life changing stuff.

[tonyblair]

Tugger2k, on Sep 25 2009, 08:31 AM, said:

A) thank the spaghetti monster for that - not that i dont love the beatles, just the thought of seeing a man who 1 - can no longer sing and 2 - after leaving the greatest band on earth went on to write the frog chorus, fills me with dread

nothing wrong with that idea

he didn't leave the band. He was the one who kept them together as long as they were...

bit of a silly point in the first place, just thought it needed correcting though

[thischarmingman]

Tugger2k, on Sep 25 2009, 09:44 AM, said:

i missed 04 - thank the maker - 2 headline acts that i would rather have a root canal with no anesthetic than see and one bloke with a fingernails worth more talent than ringo

Root canal with no anesthetic? Hhhmmm. Maybe you could just staple your eyelids to your bottom lip instead. Might stop you from talking shit for a while...

Edited by thischarmingman, 25 September 2009 - 10:28 AM.

[Wooderson]

thischarmingman, on Sep 25 2009, 11:27 AM, said:

Might stop you from talking shit for a while...

WHAMMY.