Security Firm at End of the Road
#1
Posted 15 September 2009 - 04:00 PM
In the past EOTR has been the best festival in the country for many reasons, a major one being the friendly atmosphere and nature of the staff. This year, despite the stewards being helpful and friendly, the festival was let down by the aggressive and rude nature of the security. When troubles arose with getting to see the Fleet Foxes, they approached the situation like pub bouncers. I don't feel EOTR attracts any aggresive festival goers, so i'm not sure why we were treated like them. Also the people controlling the crowd capacity in the Tipi tent were rude, insulting and inaffective. A half empty Tipi tent refused to let any one in during Charlie Parr's set because it was obviously an easier option than clearing the pathway that would allow more in. I understand that in other enviroments they're jobs could be stressful, but with EOTR and it's audience, they were in no way in keeping with the feel of the festival.
Did anyone else feel this way or was it just me?
Still, a fantastic festival which I can't wait to return to next year!
#2
Posted 15 September 2009 - 04:15 PM
I did however get fed up with the 2nd wristband check going into the garden stage, I didn't really see the point. If they're controlling numbers what's that got to do with wristbands? and if we've got into that area we must have a wristband on already surely? Only a tiny moan it was just a pain in the arse having to stop and dig out my wrist from under layers of clothes for me with the bloody crutches and for my sister who was laden with two people's gear all weekend.
#3
Posted 15 September 2009 - 06:41 PM
#4
Posted 15 September 2009 - 07:02 PM
#5
Posted 15 September 2009 - 07:48 PM
#6
Posted 15 September 2009 - 09:22 PM
#7
Posted 15 September 2009 - 09:47 PM
Knowing as I do a 6ft+ guy who is built like the proverbial brick one, and used to work as security at the NEC but is basically a big cuddly bear it is possible for security people to actually behave like something other than faceless (not to mention toothless) automata.
#8
Posted 16 September 2009 - 01:11 AM
He then told me he was gonna go and order "The Tallest Man In The Whole Wide World" (sic) from play.com cos he thought he was absolutely incredible.
I thought that was sweet.
#9
Posted 16 September 2009 - 10:01 AM
On a plus note it was nice to see that they got rid of the alcohol policy they introduced last year. Always good to be able to bring in your on booze. Still ended up spending most of my time with a Late Red in my hand. What a fantastic brew!!
Edited by HeyJoe-85, 16 September 2009 - 10:04 AM.
#10
Posted 16 September 2009 - 10:35 AM
HeyJoe-85, on Sep 16 2009, 11:01 AM, said:
On a plus note it was nice to see that they got rid of the alcohol policy they introduced last year. Always good to be able to bring in your on booze. Still ended up spending most of my time with a Late Red in my hand. What a fantastic brew!!
To be fair, the alcohol thing last year wasn't a policy, just a misunderstanding. We were still allowed to take in alcohol for the majority of the fest last year.
#11
Posted 16 September 2009 - 12:33 PM
At Fleet Foxes. I was trying to get in as well, and they were really unhelpful. You could hear people shouting 'tell us what's going on' and not getting anything back in response. And when we did get in, the place was fairly empty anyway.
So I'd suggest that the security could be a bit more relaxed and communicative in such situations, but really they weren't *that* bad (compare them to security at a club or something, they were great).
As for the idiot throwing things during HS (as well as the bottle thrown at the band someone threw a full cup of beer into the audience): is there any way he can get a life ban?
#12
Posted 16 September 2009 - 01:42 PM
Swindlebiscuit, on Sep 16 2009, 11:35 AM, said:
Really? I seem to remember there being signs up forbiding you. A blind eye was generally turned, but i'm pretty sure it was policy.
Edited by HeyJoe-85, 16 September 2009 - 01:43 PM.
#13
Posted 16 September 2009 - 01:47 PM
HeyJoe-85, on Sep 16 2009, 02:42 PM, said:
According to the powers that be, there was a misunderstanding with the security co on the Friday, which lead to them thinking that alcohol wasn't allowed in the arena. However, from what I remember this was sorted by the end of Friday - I don't remember any signs.
#14
Posted 16 September 2009 - 01:54 PM
Swindlebiscuit, on Sep 16 2009, 02:47 PM, said:
I don't remember any signs either. We weren't allowed to take drink in first thing but I think it was all sorted by the evening
#15
Posted 16 September 2009 - 04:03 PM
Sipperana, on Sep 15 2009, 10:47 PM, said:
Quote
Agree with all comments about the stewards, they were fab and friendly, and I can't think of another festival where a steward might sit at his post playing banjo and harmonica
#16
Posted 17 September 2009 - 03:07 PM
HeyJoe-85, on Sep 15 2009, 05:00 PM, said:
In the past EOTR has been the best festival in the country for many reasons, a major one being the friendly atmosphere and nature of the staff. This year, despite the stewards being helpful and friendly, the festival was let down by the aggressive and rude nature of the security. When troubles arose with getting to see the Fleet Foxes, they approached the situation like pub bouncers. I don't feel EOTR attracts any aggresive festival goers, so i'm not sure why we were treated like them. Also the people controlling the crowd capacity in the Tipi tent were rude, insulting and inaffective. A half empty Tipi tent refused to let any one in during Charlie Parr's set because it was obviously an easier option than clearing the pathway that would allow more in. I understand that in other enviroments they're jobs could be stressful, but with EOTR and it's audience, they were in no way in keeping with the feel of the festival.
Did anyone else feel this way or was it just me?
Still, a fantastic festival which I can't wait to return to next year!
Can't say I really noticed the security. Were they even working during the day (aside from next to the 2 big stages)? I only noticed them checking for wristbands in the evening, even then no problem, far far better than the larger festivals.
Regarding the incident getting in to see the Fleet Foxes, I guess on these occasions you may perhaps need to be more assertive in controlling the crowd, people don't always do what you want especially if they are trying to see a favourite band and are worried about missing out. However I didn't witness the problems of people trying to get into see the Fleet Foxes so I don't know if anything really untoward happened.
#17
Posted 17 September 2009 - 03:33 PM
#18
Posted 17 September 2009 - 05:36 PM
Wish there had been more security walking around the camping on Sunday night - maybe they could have got the bunch of noisy arseholes to go to bed before 6.00am (and this in the nominal family camping field).
I was about 10 feet behind the bottle throwing idiot at The Hold Steady. He and his friends were fans of the band!!!
#19
Posted 17 September 2009 - 05:37 PM
#20
Posted 17 September 2009 - 08:52 PM
This year I felt threated by the presence of "bouncer" style security. The fiasco we witnessed during the "Fleet Foxes" set was unbelievable, restricting festival goers entry only proved more antagonistic. Also agree with other comments, why was it necessary to show wrist bands again when entering the Garden Stage. Surely once is enough in a secure area that is the festival site
Please organisers, take note of comments in this forum post or risk loosing the calm, friendly atmosphere that is the EOTR
Marion
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













