MEGABOWL, on Jul 5 2009, 02:51 AM, said:
Doing both this year having done both in the past and my comparison is that with Glastonbury it's hard work due to the size of the place, but you get out what you put in. If you just stay at the main stages a lot of the time you could be at any major festival, but if you make the effort to get out and about it's a different experiece to anything else, and there's also far more chance of stumbling upon something new and/or different.
I'm looking forward to Leeds as an easier companion festival-lite. Like it's kid brother in comparison. I'll probably actually see more bands at Leeds and my time can be planned more exactly, it won't take the same effort and will generally be more laid back.
They're both great in different ways. Generally I would say Glastonbury tops any major festival except of course it doesn't cater well for heavier music.
I absolutely agree with everything you've said here. I like Leeds fest as a 'companion' to Glasto and know that i can go and see loads of bands quickly and with no messing. Doing that allows me more time to do other stuff at Glasto, knowing that lots of the bands i miss i can see at Leeds.
It's purely down to each individual what they want their festival experience to be. I'm lucky that i can do both, and if i couldn't i'd pick Glasto. But nobody is 'wrong' for expressing a preference one way or another.