Jump to content

CaledonianGonzo

GOLD Member
  • Posts

    40,527
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    189

Posts posted by CaledonianGonzo

  1. 3 hours ago, FloopFiller said:

    Also keep smirking at the general response to the initial album being ‘this is too long’ and then a whole second part dropping, although seems like she’s done exactly as she undoubtedly hoped and broke a whole bunch of streaming records on the first day. 

     

    Looking more and more like a tactical faux pas- folk didn't have enough time to digest the album proper before the second tranche arrived - and whether deserved or not the latter 15 tracks will always have an air of also rans about them.  She should have put a bit more breathing space between them.

  2. There was a bit of interesting discussion on the night in Soho Theatre itself on cookdandbombd when it happened.

     

    As someone who's stirred Currie's wrath in the past for not being sufficiently laudatory in my response to their act - more than once as it happens - there probably is some complexity here. But in the main I think they've been hard done by.

  3. 1 minute ago, Avalon_Fields said:

    I’d opt out on most artists bonus tracks. 95% should be billed as ‘not good enough to be on the album’.

     

    It's a decent rule of thumb for sure, but this woman has left some absolute stormers off her main album. 

     

    In the old world maybe most of them would probably have wound up as b-sides, but that's obviously a moribund concept. 

     

    Not saying that there's not an argument for keeping a stockpile handy and not releasing everything you record, but - she also doesn't do that - hence all these Vault tracks.  Probably at some future point more tracks will surface from this period.

     

    Just massively prolific. She's like Robert Pollard.

  4. 1 minute ago, st dan said:


    If anybody needs bonus tracks after 31 new songs then they have issues. 

     

    The bonus tracks are all taken from the extra 15 that arrived after the main album - and noone buying the limited variants knew that that was about to happen.

     

  5. Just now, dotdash79 said:

    Time Magazine at the start of the year

     

    Fair - but Google suggests it was her first interview in 4 years, which is still sufficiently intermittent to suggest most outlets have nothing to lose by taking the gloves off.

     

    Unless you count incurring the wrath of the fanbase - which surely doesn't matter that much to an embittered music journo.

  6. 5 minutes ago, Avalon_Fields said:

    I know she’s not the only one, but I think it’s evil to release 4 versions of the same CD/LP where the difference is just the front photo.

     

    Not defending it, cos it is a grift, but this time they do all have different bonus tracks on them.

  7. 1 minute ago, dotdash79 said:

    they are scared of being cut off by her team, she's big business. 

     

    Not seen any interviews with her for a while. Years maybe.

     

    NME gave it a kicking fwiw, even though they're more of a K-Pop news aggregator than much else these days.

×
×
  • Create New...